Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rawCpoppa

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 23, 2010
646
707
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1374898188.094411.jpg

Pic taken off coconut battery so I don't know how accurate it is. I remember reading a couple years ago that the battery in the MacBook Pro would last for longer cycles than other brands so after a year I'm surprised it's down to 92% already.

It's a 15 inch retina MacBook Pro.
 
Yes that's the claim I read about a few years ago. Thing is 92% after 120 cycles compared to 80% after 1000. The trend seems to be faster than the claims? Or is degradation not linear?

----------

Nope I don't have apple care. In live outside the US so figured I would get a run around if I needed to use it.

I hope you are right about the faster degradation early on in the laptop's life. Thanks.
 
You tried doing a smc pram reset? My 17 days retina was showing me 92% health when it was 43 cycles did the reset and it slowly went back to 100%.

Btw my macbook pro non retina has 300 charge cycles and has 95% health.

I would anyways suggest you keep monitoring it and if it goes below 80% before 1000 cycles have apple look at it.
 
mine is still at like 8800mah so over design capacity but its only 3 months old
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.