Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

BreadedVirus

macrumors member
Original poster
Feb 4, 2012
67
0
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en_GB) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

In some respects i would refer the iPod Touch more of a iPad mini. It has more in common with the iPad than the iPod.
 
:apple:Somthing along the same size as a Kindle Fire with all the iPad stuff would be great....and the price of a Kindle Fire also.
 
How can the iPod touch be a miniature version of something that came out two and a half years after it? If anything the iPad is an iPod touch "Maxi"!

Rimshot.gif
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

ok....
 
It actually has more in common with the iPhone, since it was directly based off it.

Indeed but once the Ipad launched it seemed to match that more with lesser cameras and slimmer than the Iphone design.

The big thing the Ipod lacks behind the Ipad and Iphone is the battery is quite poor and there's no 3G option yet.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.