Has anyone tried to IWrok trial version that came with Tiger? What are the limitations of the trial? How long? I have MS Office, so I can't yet decide on IWork.
muzikool said:I have used the Pages app of iWork a few times and must say that I will wait for v2.0 before purchasing it. Going from a mature word processor like Word to a new one like Pages, you will notice some features are missing or don't function the way you know they should. Apple is sure to improve it greatly for the next major release.
E-macculat said:i just installed it and it works fine
when you start for the first time he asks to purchase it or not...
i must say that i'm satisfied about the program and that i'm thinking about purchasing it.....
its a lot better then office.... at least i think so (++)
![]()
MmmPancakes said:That seems to be the concensus of everyone I've talked to about this. It's really sad because I want iWork, especially Pages, to work SO well and so much better than Word, but no matter how hard I try I just find it counterintuitive. I've heard sales of iWork have been pretty dismal, also.
jsalzer said:Topic #1 - IWork vs. iWork - I say, if it's at the beginning of a sentence, the writer can make the call. And jeers to Apple (for .Mac and iStuff), Microsoft (.net), and certain Christians (who insist that if your god's name is God, his pronouns must get capsed) for bastardizing the English language when it's entirely unnecessary.
Topic #2 - Pagination in Pages - It actually works, but the solution isn't pretty. I've actually dropped PageMaker for the publication of our catalog and have gone to Pages. If you want different column widths on each page, you're basically making each page its own Section and then telling each section to pick up where the numbering left off from the previous section. As I said, it's not pretty, but it beats working with PM or Quark!
Topic #3 - Pages as a DP app - I've actually gotten several raves about how much better this catalog looks than the ones I've previously put out. And this one took much less work on my part. The printer loves receiving the PDF file (you just have to avoid shadows, as that bug is still on the loose). And everything just feels cleaner and more natural. Will Version 2 be much better? Heck, yes. But is Version 1 a lost cause? Not if you're willing to trade in Quark's quirks for Pages' quirks.
Topic #4 - Pages vs. Word - As much as I love Pages, it's still not what I launch when I need to type up a quick letter. Primarily just because of its slowness in getting started (not to mention that some of the defaults are wacky - why on earth would I not want to default to being able to see the margins?) Personally, AppleWorks still gets called for that.
Topic #5 - To buy or not to buy - One word. Keynote. Even if it were the only app you were getting for the price, it would be worth it. Now that it has timing controls, it's ready for the prime time.![]()
That's how I feel. Pages is terrible as a word processing application.munkle said:I must be one of the few that actually likes Pages. I still use Word for my word-processing needs but load up Pages when I need to whip up a leaflet/brochure/poster etc. I regard Pages as more of a desktop publishing app than a word processor and in that regard it performs admirably. I find Word too cumbersome to perform such needs and haven't got the inclination to learn how to use InDesign. Combined with the gem that is Keynote, I'm more than happy with iWork.
munkle said:I must be one of the few that actually likes Pages. I still use Word for my word-processing needs but load up Pages when I need to whip up a leaflet/brochure/poster etc. I regard Pages as more of a desktop publishing app than a word processor and in that regard it performs admirably. I find Word too cumbersome to perform such needs and haven't got the inclination to learn how to use InDesign. Combined with the gem that is Keynote, I'm more than happy with iWork.
chipz said:I have used Pages and it is a fair word processor. However, it is not up to the standards of MS Word. It's an app in production. It is good, but not excellent. As stated previosly in this thread, the trial is for 30 days and has no limitations.