http://www.kaspersky.com/kaspersky-anti-virus-for-mac
i wonder if they seriously think they have a market for this. looks good tho
i wonder if they seriously think they have a market for this. looks good tho
Some newbies with no knowledge may buy something like that but it's useless. Norton has had antivirus for Mac for long time
That's not true. It has a use. If you are on a network and sharing files with Windows users.
http://www.kaspersky.com/kaspersky-anti-virus-for-mac
i wonder if they seriously think they have a market for this. looks good tho![]()
They've got a huge market. I've met over 5 Mac converts who bought Norton for Mac just because they don't believe the whole no virus thing and want to be extra safe!
lol well at least those ppl will now have a better choice than norton
Now that Microsoft offers a free (and presumably pretty good) AntiVirus, companies like Kaspersky have to find a new market for their software - so they try Macs.![]()
Yeah, I'm not buying Microsoft and good when it comes to viruses.
I say AV for Mac is a good insurance. Macs don't suffer from PC virus issues but a Mac is still a computer and a virus just a program, nonetheless. So, if someone were inclined to write a virus specifically for a Mac...
yup
just cuz macs arent affected by pc viruses doesnt mean they cant spread them to pc's
So? It should be up to the Windows users receiving any files from me to have AV software. I'm not wasting my time, money or system resources on AV software when viruses don't affect me.
Talk about not looking out for others. What if the people you are sending files to are friends or family? Your not bothered if you infect their Windows machines?
AnDy
To be honest, no. They're using Windows, they should be running AV and keep it updated. Like I said, I'm not wasting my money and system resources because they choose to use a vulnerable operating system.