Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mr. Dee

macrumors 603
Original poster
Dec 4, 2003
5,990
12,845
Jamaica
I need a straight answer on this, I am hearing the Late 2013 iMacs launched today that still include Fusion drives only as an option are 50% faster, but they are not PCIe based. So are they or they not?

Just want a straight answer thanks!
 
The fusion drives utilize the a small SSD - that SSD section is now going to be PCIe based which is faster than the old SSD system. So yes, it WILL be faster. How much, who knows.
 
Probably have to wait for iFixit to tear one down to be sure, but it seems highly logical with the SSD options being PCIe, so would the Fusion Drive SSD.

In the end, I went with the 256GB SSD instead of the Fusion Drive since I just added a Synology DS413 so I am not hurting for media storage.
 
Apple advertise the Late 2013 iMac's Fusion Drive as 1,5x faster than the Late 2012's one, so I guess it has to be PCIe based.
 
Thanks everyone, hopefully we will learn more in the next few days. Not making my purchase until late November anyway.
 
I think it's 1x SATA and 1x PCIe. If you opt for a fusion drive, both slots are populated and it's treated as one logical disk. If you opt for an HDD only, the PCIe slot is empty. If you opt for an SSD only, there's nothing attached to SATA.
 
Probably have to wait for iFixit to tear one down to be sure, but it seems highly logical with the SSD options being PCIe, so would the Fusion Drive SSD.

In the end, I went with the 256GB SSD instead of the Fusion Drive since I just added a Synology DS413 so I am not hurting for media storage.

Both options are fine...depends on your needs,,,
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.