LG an Sharp failed to meet quality standards, backlight bleed fixed now with Samsung?

[bobright]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

So reports are that, and that Samsung is supplying the Retina screens on the new iPad. If apple acknowledged the backlight bleed from the previous iPad - anybody think it's now addressed/fixed?

 

[vincenz]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

So reports are that, and that Samsung is supplying the Retina screens on the new iPad. If apple acknowledged the backlight bleed from the previous iPad - anybody think it's now addressed/fixed?

Who said they "acknowledged the backlight bleed?"

 

[mac jones]

Somehow I suspect that wasn't their concern at the time

note: I seem to recall reading that it was the yield they were worried about.

 

[bobright]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

So reports are that, and that Samsung is supplying the Retina screens on the new iPad. If apple acknowledged the backlight bleed from the previous iPad - anybody think it's now addressed/fixed?

Who said they "acknowledged the backlight bleed?"

I'm saying if they did since the reports are that LG and Sharp failed to meet quality standards, and now it's strictly Samsung providing the displays (perhaps its now fixed).

Also during that whole fiasco last year genius were told and allowed to do only a 1-time exchange for the backlight bleed. So it looks like they did know about it.