Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Cameraman12

macrumors member
Original poster
Mar 14, 2009
82
80
Cali
Barefeats tests are finally coming out. This was the latest:


"The M1 Max MacBook Pro beat the M1 Pro MacBook Pro in all but 2 tests. In nine tests, the M1 Max smoked the M1 Pro."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: metapunk2077fail
Only on GPU related tasks, as expected. The Max had 2x more GPU cores than the Pro.

Unless I'm missing something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanpete
"In seven tests, the M1 Max smoked the M1 Pro."

That's some careful editing work there...

It's a 16GB M1Pro 14" vs 32GB M1Max 16". There are 17 tests in the Barefeats battery. The full quote is "The M1 Max MacBook Pro beat the M1 Pro MacBook Pro in all but 2 tests. In seven tests, the M1 Max smoked the M1 Pro."

So the score is:

8 tests, no significant difference.
1 test, the Max wins without smoke.
2 tests, the Pro (barely) wins.
7 tests, the Max smokes the Pro.

We're back where we started: the Max helps if you have a use case that makes puts all the GPU cores to work.
 
Oh no, how will we all survive this earth shattering news??
 
Only on GPU related tasks, as expected. The Max had 2x more GPU cores than the Pro.

Unless I'm missing something?

2X more video encoding engines on the Max, but software has to optimised for it. Premiere has some inconsistencies in export time at the moment, but not render times.
 
The M1 Pro is the better buy for most people that only need CPU because you get equivalent CPU performance but better battery life.
I have to agree with you. The Max would be amazing for me as I do lots of 3D work which likes the GPU, but I have a budget for a computer and just seeing the performance overall of M1 and M1 Pro is astonishing compared to my now-peasant i7 ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.