Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,699
40,978


Apple's newly introduced M5 chip takes Apple silicon to the next level, delivering meaningful gains across CPU, GPU, and AI workloads, but how does it compare to the M4?

M4-vs-M5-Feature.jpg

Compared to the M4 chip that Apple launched in May 2024, the M5 delivers:

  • Up to 15% faster multithreaded CPU performance
  • Up to 30% faster overall graphics performance
  • Up to 45% faster ray tracing performance
  • 27.5% higher unified memory bandwidth

In addition to general performance claims, Apple published a set of specific real-world workload results showing measurable gains in AI-driven applications:

  • 4×+ peak GPU compute performance for AI
  • 3.6× faster time to first token (LLM)
  • 1.8× faster Topaz Video Enhance AI processing
  • 1.7× faster Blender ray-traced rendering
  • 2.9× faster AI speech enhancement in Premiere Pro

With the M5, Apple is heavily emphasizing an AI-centric design. The company says the new GPU architecture includes a dedicated Neural Accelerator within every GPU core, and that the chip delivers more than six times the peak GPU compute performance for AI compared to the M1. Apple also cites improvements to the Neural Engine, memory bandwidth, and developer-facing APIs to support on-device AI models. Other hardware changes compared to the M4 include:

M4 ChipM5 Chip
Made with TSMC's second-generation 3nm process (N3E)Made TSMC's third-generation 3nm process (N3P)
No integrated Neural AcceleratorsIntegrated Neural Accelerator in every GPU core
Metal 3 developer APIsMetal 4 developer APIs with Tensor APIs to program GPU Neural Accelerators
Second-generation ray tracing engineThird-generation ray tracing engine
First-generation dynamic cachingSecond-generation dynamic caching
Shader coresEnhanced shader cores
120 GB/s unified memory bandwidth153 GB/s unified memory bandwidth
Support for up to 2TB storageSupport for up to 4TB storage


For users whose workloads include on-device AI inference, complex 3D rendering, or other GPU-bound or memory-intensive tasks, the jump from M4 to M5 is material. The combination of per-core Neural Accelerators, higher memory bandwidth, and new GPU architecture produces multi-fold speed-ups in certain AI operations. In environments where time-to-result directly affects workflow, such as local LLMs, diffusion models, video enhancement, or ray-traced production or gaming, the M5 represents a meaningful step-change rather than a minor iteration.

By contrast, for typical day-to-day usage, browsing, office work, media playback, basic editing, and general responsiveness, the difference is unlikely to be perceptible. The M4 was already a high-performance chip that routinely exceeded the demands of normal Mac and iPad workloads, leaving little visible headroom to exploit with the M5. In non-specialist scenarios, devices equipped with the M4 remain effectively indistinguishable in experience from those running with an M5.

As a result, average users should not be dissuaded from buying or keeping an M4 machine. That being said, if you plan to keep your device for many years, M5 devices will be more future-proof and better equipped to handle increasingly popular AI-based utilities.

The M5 chip is currently available only in the 14-inch MacBook Pro, the latest iPad Pro, and the Apple Vision Pro. Higher-end M5 Pro and M5 Max variants are expected to follow in future Mac models.


Article Link: M4 vs. M5 Chip Buyer's Guide: How Much Better Really Is M5?
 
We'll likely see huge increases in AI performance in next few generations, as the demand for LLM use skyrocketed over the past couple of years and it takes several years for a chip to complete its design. Tons more optimizations left in hardware, including lower precision FP2/FP4 quantization.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlyssaUnbound
If I can make a suggestion; articles like this one would make sense if you were to compare it to the last 4 or 5 versions of the same hardware. Most people aren't going to bother upgrading to each iteration of said device.

Make a table, make it readable, make it crystal clear what the gains are over the years. That would make for some proper journalism, people will be able to make a sound decision whether to upgrade or not, and they will be happy to read in-depth articles on all differences. And the author will be vastly more proud of said work.
 
I am coming from an M1 Pro. I do photo editing in Lightroom Classic. Is there a significant difference between M4 and M5 for my use case?
I wouldn’t think so. M1 was such a huge leap that every new one afterwards have been small jumps in performance, despite what Apple loves to say. That said, I think you’ll see a noticeable difference between M1 and those versions
 
By contrast, for typical day-to-day usage, browsing, office work, media playback, basic editing, and general responsiveness, the difference is unlikely to be perceptible. The M4 was already a high-performance chip that routinely exceeded the demands of normal Mac and iPad workloads, leaving little visible headroom to exploit with the M5. In non-specialist scenarios, devices equipped with the M4 remain effectively indistinguishable in experience from those running with an M5.
The same could be said of the M1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck and StoneJack
If I can make a suggestion; articles like this one would make sense if you were to compare it to the last 4 or 5 versions of the same hardware. Most people aren't going to bother upgrading to each iteration of said device.

Make a table, make it readable, make it crystal clear what the gains are over the years. That would make for some proper journalism, people will be able to make a sound decision whether to upgrade or not, and they will be happy to read in-depth articles on all differences. And the author will be vastly more proud of said work.
Absolutely agree... At least 2 or 3 generations. Upgrading your Mac with every single release is niche and makes this article, with is actually quite good in it's one generation comparison, less useful than it could have otherwise been.
 
Absolutely agree... At least 2 or 3 generations. Upgrading your Mac with every single release is niche and makes this article, with is actually quite good in it's one generation comparison, less useful than it could have otherwise been.

M1 Max should be the baseline for comparison.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Huck and DaniTheFox
The video Demystifying Apple’s AMX AI accelerator: when and why it outperforms the GPU is a great educational piece. The huge increase in matrix-multiply speed explains most of the "3.6x faster time to first token" speed improvements. IMHO, the money quote from that video:

because nowadays, the energy needed to transfer data significantly exceeds the energy needed to perform computations on the data

Fetching the matrixes to be multiplied only once makes a huge difference in the speed of the operation -- the bread-and-butter of LLM training and execution. Apparently, NVIDIA has had this feature for a long time on their Tensor Cores.

Petar posted this video right after the September 9 event. It's gratifying that Apple included that enhancement in the baseline M5 chip. It should make a big difference for the speed and energy expenditure of all locally-run LLMs. I'm hoping this enhancement will become available on the entire line of all future A-series processors, too.
 
Last edited:

based on that: 4 percent difference
Those are points associated with a scale they use. It is not a percentage of speed increase.

If you look further down the article it shows this for Geekbench scores, which is what a majority use when determining percentage increases in speed YoY for a processor.

13% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 4252 vs 3777 points
 
My M4 MacBook Pro already has more than 10x the processing power I need for daily use, including recording audio in Logic Pro X. I’ll just stick to my “upgrade every 5 years” plan.
Honestly even every 5 years feels excessive now. I was using a 2013 trash can Mac Pro until the end of 2023, and my M2 Max Studio will probably last me another decade. For Logic I really could’ve stuck to the old machine, I feel the difference mostly in web tasks and especially 4K video editing.
 
Up to 2X faster SSD speeds in these new machines too. Nothing to sniff at.

UPDATE:
Heads-up, just watching Dave2D’s review, his 1TB M5 MBP gets 5,100 MB/s read and 5,400 MB/s write speeds. Versus his 1TB M4 MBP which got 3,100 MB/s read and 3,500 MB/s write. So not quite twice as fast as people recently were claiming.

Shock-horror the internet spoke a fib. So around 50% SSD spoed increased on the base machine. We’ll need to wait and see how the M5 Pro and M5 Max MBPs do. More TB means faster SSD read and write speeds. Someone’s 8 TB M4 Max MBP got over 8,000 MB/s read speeds. Let’s see how the speed increases translate to those more expensive machines too. Temper your expectations.

Here’s novagamer’s 8 TB model from last year: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/m4-mbp-ssd-speeds.2442283/post-33570007
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.