Have to disagree with that. Having used a 5k iMac screen a lot of years, nothing less than that panel will be good enough in my view. Easily the best screen I’ve ever used. Pin sharp, no blurring due to mismatched pixels due to being exactly 4x 1440p res. 4K is inferior in every way. So Studio Display or LG Ultrafine are the only 2 options I’d consider.
That’s OK. The point is not to argue that one screen is THE one for all. It’s to encourage those who want something other than only 2 choices offered by Apple to jump on this encouraged(?) opportunity to shop around and see for themselves.
The truth is that not all but only 2 screens will appear blurry, etc. For example, I have 20:20 vision and the one I chose looks as "pin sharp" as the iMac 27” it replaces to me. I’m not anti-Apple or anything- it’s paired with a brand new $6K Mac, so Apple certainly got theirs out of me. But I definitely wanted
WIDER than 27” 16:10… and got it… and LOVE it. If Apple offered an ultra-wide, I would have probably gone that way... but they don't offer the kind of monitor I wanted. They only offer 2 choices: exactly 27" or $6K. There's LOTS of possibilities other than those two.
Those with the ability and a MB should do themselves a service and take that MB to some retailers with a variety of screens of interest, hook it up and judge for themselves. They may very well find themselves right back to this new one from Apple or the cheaper, made-in-cooperation-with-Apple LG. Or… they may get the size bigger than 27” they
really want… or the ultra-wide they
really want… etc. It doesn’t hurt
ANY consumer to at least take a look.
Those who land on this new one from Apple will get a great monitor. Those who land on that LG will get the “go to” monitor generally encouraged for a few years up until a few weeks ago. And those who end up with something else will enjoy whatever made them choose that other monitor. Everyone can get what they want.