Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

baaadboy

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 20, 2010
47
0
Hi guys,
I am soon to be a mac user. I finally got sick from my old windows machine and decided to switch. I am a software engineer so I thought some iOS development as a hobby wouldn't hurt, so I need a macbook pro.
But which one?

I assume 1280x800 resolution on a 13 inch pro is too low for XCode right?

But seriously I can't justify paying 600 more for a 15" pro, just for higher resolution. I could care less about quad core stuff, since I won't notice the difference anyway.

So my choice comes down to this:
1.Either get a refurbished Macbook Pro 15 2010 base model for 1269+tax=1357 from apple
2. Get a brand new Macbook Pro 15 2010 base model for 1433.62 shipped from costcentral.com
3. Get a brand new Macbook Pro 15 2011 base model 1799+tax=1925 from apple

I don't think I can justify overpaying for a new 2011 model just for the sandy bridge processor. But if i really have to, I might consider it overpaying but I wouldn't like to.

Which one do you guys think I should get?
The price of the refurbished is really tempting, but if I take into account taxes, the difference for the brand new one (2010 model) is actually 76 dollars.

I am more leaning towards the brand new 2010 model, for 1433 shipped, but can't decide.

Please help
 
Hi guys,
I am soon to be a mac user. I finally got sick from my old windows machine and decided to switch. I am a software engineer so I thought some iOS development as a hobby wouldn't hurt, so I need a macbook pro.
But which one?

I assume 1280x800 resolution on a 13 inch pro is too low for XCode right?

But seriously I can't justify paying 600 more for a 15" pro, just for higher resolution. I could care less about quad core stuff, since I won't notice the difference anyway.

So my choice comes down to this:
1.Either get a refurbished Macbook Pro 15 2010 base model for 1269+tax=1357 from apple
2. Get a brand new Macbook Pro 15 2010 base model for 1433.62 shipped from costcentral.com
3. Get a brand new Macbook Pro 15 2011 base model 1799+tax=1925 from apple

I don't think I can justify overpaying for a new 2011 model just for the sandy bridge processor. But if i really have to, I might consider it overpaying but I wouldn't like to.

Which one do you guys think I should get?
The price of the refurbished is really tempting, but if I take into account taxes, the difference for the brand new one (2010 model) is actually 76 dollars.

I am more leaning towards the brand new 2010 model, for 1433 shipped, but can't decide.

Please help

I'm not a dev (but I dabble in programming and minored in comp sci in college), but why would that resolution be too low for XCode? It's an IDE; We're talking about a modern LCD here, not a dot matrix printer. Perhaps I missed something. Testing retina display quality graphics intensive applications perhaps?
 
Given that you didn't want to spend that much, I'll go with option 2 in your list of choices.

Good luck. :)
 
Just hook the 13 inch up to an external monitor
I dont know about Xcode but i use an samsung SyncMaster 2333HD
TV/Monitor.
 
You can get option 3 on amazon for less. I was able to get mine from amazon tax free which saved quite a bit and shipping is free.
 
Thank you all for replies guys.
I think I will go with option 2. The cheapest 2011 model I could find is 1699, still significantly more expensive than 2010 model. I am not really into "future proofing" my laptop, since I will be getting a new one in 2-3 years anyway. Besides, I never liked the idea of having the same laptop for more than 4 years, I mean come on, you get tired of staring at the same thing for that long.

I think I will go with option 2 and buy a third party ssd drive.
 
I'm not a dev (but I dabble in programming and minored in comp sci in college), but why would that resolution be too low for XCode? It's an IDE; We're talking about a modern LCD here, not a dot matrix printer. Perhaps I missed something. Testing retina display quality graphics intensive applications perhaps?

Well yeah, i mean it depends on what you are used to. I have been using a windows machine with 1680x1050 and for me 1280x800 will be a serious downgrade. I played with my friend's macbook pro 13" for several minutes and while he was satisfied with the way Xcode looked, to me it seemed way too cramped.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.