Why do you keep posting ridiculous statements like the hard drives Apple use are not very good. I don't mean to be hard on you but you have been posting quite a few silly blanket statements lately. I am sure you mean well but some people may actually believe you.
Because their hard drives are NOT as good as other drives. Furthermore, you are criticizing me with complete lack of evidence, so that really makes you credible. So, I don't have time to get every statistic to show that what I say has meaning, but here are a few points so check it out dude!!!
If you don't believe, go look up the reviews of the drives used in MBPs and compare them to the Seagate, Western Digital, and Samsung drives of the exact same price.
Here is an example. A common factory drive in the MacBook Pro, 13inch, mid 2009 is the Fujitsu MJA2250BH FFS G1. ALSO, the Toshibas seen in the 13 are likely the Fujitsu design as well, given in late 2009, Fujitsu left the hard drive business and sold their assets to Toshiba (and right around this time we started seeing Toshiba HDDs). Let's compare how the Fujitsu drive stacks up against a random hard drive...I am going to compare it to the Seagate Momentus 7200.4 250GB HDD (model number ST9250410AS), as you can buy it for as little as $40, so the cost of the existing Fujitsu drive is almost the same as the Momentus (actually the Fujitsu is on average more than the Momentus). Also, the Momentus is 250GB; you can get the 500GB version for an extra $20. Keep in mind. The Momentus is one of numerous hard drives a lot of people here upgrade to; with that said it is not the fastest nor most expensive HDD on the market. None the less, its performance figures and user ratings have shown that you don’t have to spend a lot of money to get a nice hard drive.
Overall Rating
-Fujitsu-289 (3rd from the bottom and notice what other hard drives are their)
-Seagate Momentus: 537
RPM Speed
-Fujitsu-7200RPM
-Seagate-5400RPM
Latency
-Fujitsu-5.56 to 22 ms (conflicting data)
-Seagate-4.17 to 14.3 ms
Transfer Min/Max/Average
-Fujitsu-38.7/88.9/67.5 MB/s
-Seagate-49/107.3/81.3 MB/s
Cache
-Fujitsu-8MB
-Seagate-16MB
Reliability
-Fujitsu-Unable to find consistent data
-Seagate-0.5% AFR
Warranty
-Fujitsu-1 or 3 years, conflicting data
-Seagate-3 years
Buffer
-Fujitsu-8mb
-Seagate-16mb w/ 512 bytes per sector
Recovery
-Fujitsu-Not disclosed
-Seagate-1 sector in 10^15 bits
Noise
-Fujitsu-Unable to find
-Seagate-2.5-2.8Bel
Durability-Operating/Non-operating Shock
-Fujitsu-300-350G/900G
-Seagate-350G/1,000G
Operating Altitude
-Fujitsu-Unable to find
-Seagate- -300 to 3,000 meters
Operating Temperature-min/max
-Fujitsu-41/131
-Seagate-32/140
Operating Humidity-min/max-%
-Fujitsu-8/90%
-Seagate-5/95%
Power Consumption
-Fujitsu-1.4 to 2.3 watts functioning
-Seagate-appr 1 watt standby/6 watts functioning
This is not a fluke; many hard drives, which cost the same amount as the factory Apple drive, are superior. There are tons of reports on the Fujitsu failing quickly, some within a few days of initial use. Apple should have used a better hard drive on such an expensive laptop. With that said, I love my MBP and had no problem getting a better one. I will continue to advise people to AVOID purchasing another factory hard drive as it is clear as day that you can do better for the same dollar amount.
Some of the Numerous Sources:
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Laptop-harddisks-HDD-SSD-comparison.22089.0.html?&desc=1&sort=31
http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/hdd_lookup.php?cpu=Seagate+ST9250410AS
http://www.directron.com/mja2250bh.html
http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=e9f188b2ea9dd110VgnVCM100000f5ee0a0aRCRD
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4777425&CatId=2682
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822116168
Product review
http://www.google.com/products/cata...9250410AS&cid=11016687524722808046&os=reviews
http://www.zdnet.com/reviews/produc...mja2250bh-hard-drive-250-gb-sata-300/33629015