is there any point of norton on a mac?
It depends on the CPU use, but there are other free and less resource-taking AV titles for Mac OS X out there, like ClamXav or so.
Use MRoogle to find those thousands of AV threads, but I use Mac OS X since 2004 and never came upon a trojan or any other kind of malware, and I don't use any AV software and don't install anything I come upon (common sense). And viruses don't exist for Mac OS X (are currently not in public circulation, for those present tense confusers). Norton could be viewed as a virus though, or at least as some kind of malware.
so realistically, running it in background shouldnt cut battery life in half?
its the version which covers both osx and bootcamp at the same time, thats the only reason i have it
no it shouldn't.so realistically, running it in background
shouldnt cut battery life in half?
I didn't even ever have a virus on windows so I'm not running AV on windows
no it shouldn't.
It's up to you if you want to have it running, I always felt (under windows that is, but wouldn't be so much different) that most AV would get worse in terms of resource usage over time and usually, whenever I tried one, after 4 weeks I uninstalled it because the system became sluggish - and never looked back. I'm just careful what software I install etc.
as previously said, running AV on mac is like putting on two condoms while piping, pointless