Ideally, I want a Macbook Pro and a new iMac... My 2008 iMac has held up okay, except for the motherboard (thank god for apple car). It's starting to show its age and I find myself constantly bored, annoyed and frustrated with the delays in even simple tasks. I want a fully specced out comp so I can spend more time actually using my computer instead of staring at a stupid beach ball.
My question is would it be comparable to get a MacBook Pro 2.6GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.8GHz instead of an iMac 3.5GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 (Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz... I was thinking just run a cross over cable to my 24 inch 2008 iMac so I still get the bigger screen while at home.... How noticeable would the performance hit be??? My Fear is the fall iMac release won't feature Broadwell (AGAINNN) or ddr4 ram. Each system fully spec'd out costs about 3k, and i'm sorry if you expect someone to spend 3k it should feature the latest technology available so it truly lasts. Even though its a substantial leap compared to the 2008 model, I just can't justify in my mind that big of an expense for a device with a dated processor and RAM. Would that make me a Maniac if I just use the cross over cable until Skylake or ddr4? Then with a 6 year useful life I would position myself for a new system every 3 years, food for though I guess. Any perspective would be greatly appreciated!!! Spending 7k a year on Apple devices is worse than a bad drug habit I think lol =)
My question is would it be comparable to get a MacBook Pro 2.6GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.8GHz instead of an iMac 3.5GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 (Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz... I was thinking just run a cross over cable to my 24 inch 2008 iMac so I still get the bigger screen while at home.... How noticeable would the performance hit be??? My Fear is the fall iMac release won't feature Broadwell (AGAINNN) or ddr4 ram. Each system fully spec'd out costs about 3k, and i'm sorry if you expect someone to spend 3k it should feature the latest technology available so it truly lasts. Even though its a substantial leap compared to the 2008 model, I just can't justify in my mind that big of an expense for a device with a dated processor and RAM. Would that make me a Maniac if I just use the cross over cable until Skylake or ddr4? Then with a 6 year useful life I would position myself for a new system every 3 years, food for though I guess. Any perspective would be greatly appreciated!!! Spending 7k a year on Apple devices is worse than a bad drug habit I think lol =)