First off, I'm not trying to flame or troll or anything here.
I'm looking for some feedback. Obviously by posting here I'm looking for some biased feedback. Convince me that the Macbook Pro is worth an extra $845.
I want a laptop. I want to run Linux on that laptop.
I was looking at macbooks because Macbook Pros had yucky ATI graphics which don't play well with Linux.
Then when Apple came out with the newest Macbook Pros with Nvidia graphics I started looking again.
They were Very nice and Dell did not have anything in comparison.
I'd be waiting for Leopard before I bought an Apple anyway so I wait....and then Dell comes out with the Inspiron 1520.
It is upgradeable to pretty much the same specs as the new Macbook Pro. You can't get the 2.4GHz, but I would have wanted the 2.0 or 2.2 anyway.
So I select the fastest one (2.2GHz) at Dell just to get a good comparison of prices.
I keep the memory at 2Gb
I upgrade the HDD to 160Gb / 7200RPM.
I Upgrade the display to 1680x1050 (better than Apple's 1440x900)
I upgrade the video card to 256MB GeForce 8600M GT (same as Macbook Pro)
I select the 2MP web cam even though I probably won't use it.
I get Bluetooth (not even sure if Macbooks have this)
I upgrade the wireless from Dell to Intel Wireless N
I upgrade to a DVD burner
I upgrade the battery from 56Whr to an 85Whr
I even upgrade From Vista Home Basic to Vista Home Premium in case I want to try Aero or whatever its called
I basically max out every option...
Anyway, with my discounts at both places the Dell came out to be $1,591.42
So then I go to Apple and select the middle Macbook Pro so I can get 256Mb of graphics.
I upgrade the hard drive to 7200RPM and it is now $2,437.00 after discounts
So...
The Dell has a higher resolution screen which is something that I care about and is $845.58 less.
I love my girlfriend's 12.1" Dell XPS laptop with 1280x800....very crisp.
What I'd like to know is what the Macbook Pro has besides the $845.58 higher price tag.
What I already know it has is a 0.2GHz faster processor (2.4 vs 2.2), a backlit keyboard, an LED lit LCD display, and OSX.
With OSX comes the ability to run iTunes although there are alternatives for that in Linux too.
Am I missing anything?
I have never used OSX, I have seen people use it and it looks nice but since I've never used it I wouldn't miss it. (I run Linux w/ XFCE and compiz-fusion on my desktop at home and that is very nice too)
I have never seen a Macbook Pro at night to see what the keyboard is like but I heard good things about it. Doesn't it have an ambient light sensor or something too?
Anyway, please tell me if I am overlooking something here with the Macbook Pro.
It would be nice to triple boot, but not for $845 (plus the price of Vista or XP) more.
With the Macbooks they seemed to be priced competitively and it would have been very close to something I could get at Dell, maybe only $100 more, but those had intel graphics. I would definitely pay for the Macbook Pro if it was only $100 or $200 more than the equivalent hardware from Dell.
So, please tell me your thoughts.
Thanks,
~Eric
I'm looking for some feedback. Obviously by posting here I'm looking for some biased feedback. Convince me that the Macbook Pro is worth an extra $845.
I want a laptop. I want to run Linux on that laptop.
I was looking at macbooks because Macbook Pros had yucky ATI graphics which don't play well with Linux.
Then when Apple came out with the newest Macbook Pros with Nvidia graphics I started looking again.
They were Very nice and Dell did not have anything in comparison.
I'd be waiting for Leopard before I bought an Apple anyway so I wait....and then Dell comes out with the Inspiron 1520.
It is upgradeable to pretty much the same specs as the new Macbook Pro. You can't get the 2.4GHz, but I would have wanted the 2.0 or 2.2 anyway.
So I select the fastest one (2.2GHz) at Dell just to get a good comparison of prices.
I keep the memory at 2Gb
I upgrade the HDD to 160Gb / 7200RPM.
I Upgrade the display to 1680x1050 (better than Apple's 1440x900)
I upgrade the video card to 256MB GeForce 8600M GT (same as Macbook Pro)
I select the 2MP web cam even though I probably won't use it.
I get Bluetooth (not even sure if Macbooks have this)
I upgrade the wireless from Dell to Intel Wireless N
I upgrade to a DVD burner
I upgrade the battery from 56Whr to an 85Whr
I even upgrade From Vista Home Basic to Vista Home Premium in case I want to try Aero or whatever its called
I basically max out every option...
Anyway, with my discounts at both places the Dell came out to be $1,591.42
So then I go to Apple and select the middle Macbook Pro so I can get 256Mb of graphics.
I upgrade the hard drive to 7200RPM and it is now $2,437.00 after discounts
So...
The Dell has a higher resolution screen which is something that I care about and is $845.58 less.
I love my girlfriend's 12.1" Dell XPS laptop with 1280x800....very crisp.
What I'd like to know is what the Macbook Pro has besides the $845.58 higher price tag.
What I already know it has is a 0.2GHz faster processor (2.4 vs 2.2), a backlit keyboard, an LED lit LCD display, and OSX.
With OSX comes the ability to run iTunes although there are alternatives for that in Linux too.
Am I missing anything?
I have never used OSX, I have seen people use it and it looks nice but since I've never used it I wouldn't miss it. (I run Linux w/ XFCE and compiz-fusion on my desktop at home and that is very nice too)
I have never seen a Macbook Pro at night to see what the keyboard is like but I heard good things about it. Doesn't it have an ambient light sensor or something too?
Anyway, please tell me if I am overlooking something here with the Macbook Pro.
It would be nice to triple boot, but not for $845 (plus the price of Vista or XP) more.
With the Macbooks they seemed to be priced competitively and it would have been very close to something I could get at Dell, maybe only $100 more, but those had intel graphics. I would definitely pay for the Macbook Pro if it was only $100 or $200 more than the equivalent hardware from Dell.
So, please tell me your thoughts.
Thanks,
~Eric