Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

yossiri

macrumors newbie
Original poster
May 3, 2013
5
0
As I have seen many questions asking about the new MacBook Pro benchmarking in many threads here, I will show you the result I saw in Japanese website below.

http://www.macotakara.jp/blog/macintosh/entry-21529.html

Both CPU and GPU are benchmarked compared with the previous model using Geekbench 3.

You may not understand Japanese but at least the results in the pictures are in English.

Hope it useful for you :D

(Sorry for poor English and I will thank a lot if someone can correct my grammar!!)
 
Last edited:
As I have seen many questions asking about the new MacBook Pro benchmarking in many threads here, I will show you the result I saw in Japanese website below.

http://www.macotakara.jp/blog/macintosh/entry-21529.html

Both CPU and GPU are benchmarked compared with the previous model using Geekbench 3.

You may not understand Japanese but at least the results in the pictures are in English.

Hope it useful for you :D

(Sorry for poor English and I will thank a lot if someone can correct my grammar!!)

英語が上手ですね。

I'm surprised that the late-2013 2.6 has such a lead over the 2.3.

Thanks for the benchmarks.
 
Theres clearly something messed up here. How can the HD4000 out perform both the 650M and the Iris Pro?

and isnt the 650M supposed to be more powerful than the Iris Pro?
 
Theres clearly something messed up here. How can the HD4000 out perform both the 650M and the Iris Pro?

and isnt the 650M supposed to be more powerful than the Iris Pro?


I think the HD4000 got better result because it was run under native lower resolution of the 13 inch (may be).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.