Would really appreciate any and all thoughts on this...
I ordered a new 2.2 17" MBP 2011 antiglare through JR.com and after it had shipped I saw the 2011 17" refurbished units start appearing at the Apple Online Store... I found the same model I ordered through JR but with the 2.3 CPU and after all is said and done it would end up costing me the same as the *new* JR 2.2 MBP. I bought this one as well and figured I'd check it out and then return one of them.
I've bought refurbished before (Mac Pro) and have had nothing but great results. Although I was a bit weary with a laptop since it's sort of more apt to scratches and what not.
Anyhow, I checked out the refurbished 2.3 and found a few very minor scratches on the case, for the most part not that noticeable... the worst of which is an actual tiny nic in the aluminum. The machine itself seems fine of course, runs well etc.
The the question is, which one to keep? The 2.3 speed increase over the 2.2 is pretty much negligible from all the tests I've seen, and therefore I would definitely not "pay extra" for it... but considering the price here was essentially the same as the 2.2 it's a different scenario. I'm just debating whether or I can deal with the minor scratches (and I mean minor), or if I should just forget the small speed improvement and go with a brand new 2.2 that I have yet to open. I've heard of some people contacting Apple and letting them know that there are some scratches and that they'd like a replacement, but there's no guarantee that the replacement won't have scratches, or it could be worse.
Thanks all for your input...
I ordered a new 2.2 17" MBP 2011 antiglare through JR.com and after it had shipped I saw the 2011 17" refurbished units start appearing at the Apple Online Store... I found the same model I ordered through JR but with the 2.3 CPU and after all is said and done it would end up costing me the same as the *new* JR 2.2 MBP. I bought this one as well and figured I'd check it out and then return one of them.
I've bought refurbished before (Mac Pro) and have had nothing but great results. Although I was a bit weary with a laptop since it's sort of more apt to scratches and what not.
Anyhow, I checked out the refurbished 2.3 and found a few very minor scratches on the case, for the most part not that noticeable... the worst of which is an actual tiny nic in the aluminum. The machine itself seems fine of course, runs well etc.
The the question is, which one to keep? The 2.3 speed increase over the 2.2 is pretty much negligible from all the tests I've seen, and therefore I would definitely not "pay extra" for it... but considering the price here was essentially the same as the 2.2 it's a different scenario. I'm just debating whether or I can deal with the minor scratches (and I mean minor), or if I should just forget the small speed improvement and go with a brand new 2.2 that I have yet to open. I've heard of some people contacting Apple and letting them know that there are some scratches and that they'd like a replacement, but there's no guarantee that the replacement won't have scratches, or it could be worse.
Thanks all for your input...