Besides the Retina screen and being slimmer, and the default ssd, is there any other difference compared to regular 15inch MBP? Thanks.
The real 15" MBP has the minimum ports a Mac should have, except ExpressCard and eSATAp.
Also the RAM is user upgradeable in the non-retina Macbook Pro, but is soldered to the logic board in the Retina model.
On Apple's site, I see that they both have 1 Thunderbolt port and no HDMI (unless using a thunderbolt/hdmi adapter).
On Apple's site, I see that they both have 1 Thunderbolt port and no HDMI (unless using a thunderbolt/hdmi adapter).
MagSafe 2 power port
Two Thunderbolt ports (up to 10 Gbps)
Two USB 3 ports (up to 5 Gbps)
HDMI port
Headphone port
SDXC card slot
Apple Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (sold separately)
Apple Thunderbolt to FireWire Adapter (sold separately, available July)
ExpressCard and eSATA have been overtaken by USB 3.0.
No, they really haven't. USB 3.0 isn't even remotely comparable to ExpressCard. And it's not really a competitor for eSATA, either.
Look, I know people like Apple. Heck, I mostly like Apple. But this thing of insisting that anything Apple didn't include must be worthless, and that USB is somehow a replacement for high-performance buses and interfaces, is ridiculous. USB is not a credible alternative to any of FireWire, eSATA, or ExpressCard. It cannot do what they can do. It does not replace them. It does not provide functional alternatives to them. It's a suitable way to attach a lot of things where performance isn't important.
No, they really haven't. USB 3.0 isn't even remotely comparable to ExpressCard. And it's not really a competitor for eSATA, either.
Look, I know people like Apple. Heck, I mostly like Apple. But this thing of insisting that anything Apple didn't include must be worthless, and that USB is somehow a replacement for high-performance buses and interfaces, is ridiculous. USB is not a credible alternative to any of FireWire, eSATA, or ExpressCard. It cannot do what they can do. It does not replace them. It does not provide functional alternatives to them. It's a suitable way to attach a lot of things where performance isn't important.
thunderbolt covers what ExpressCard used to do.
It's just a matter of the old expresscard accessories coming out in thunderbolt versions now.
I'm a big fan of firewire though. Sad that's gone, and regulated out to an adapter
But Thunderbolt is and does. Thunderbolt is external PCI-Express. The Retina Macbook Pro has four usable lanes, 10GB/s bidirectional per lane. That means that between the two ports there's a total of 80GB/s of aggregate bandwidth available.
Yes it's still an early technology, but it is technically capable of handling all of those things you have mentioned.
ExpressCard and eSATA have been overtaken by USB 3.0.
No, they really haven't. USB 3.0 isn't even remotely comparable to ExpressCard. And it's not really a competitor for eSATA, either.
Look, I know people like Apple. Heck, I mostly like Apple. But this thing of insisting that anything Apple didn't include must be worthless, and that USB is somehow a replacement for high-performance buses and interfaces, is ridiculous. USB is not a credible alternative to any of FireWire, eSATA, or ExpressCard. It cannot do what they can do. It does not replace them. It does not provide functional alternatives to them. It's a suitable way to attach a lot of things where performance isn't important.
thunderbolt covers what ExpressCard used to do. It's just a matter of the old expresscard accessories coming out in thunderbolt versions now.
On Apple's site, I see that they both have 1 Thunderbolt port and no HDMI (unless using a thunderbolt/hdmi adapter).
It doesn't. You cannot put a thunderbolt adapter inside a thunderbolt port.
Only very very approximately. It's at least comparable in bandwidth, but... Form factor and supplied power are also issues.
And not all of them will.
It doesn't. You cannot put a thunderbolt adapter inside a thunderbolt port.
But I don't see how form factor is an issue. Instead of needing a large card input, there's the small thunderbolt cable. Seems like a step up in that regard to me.
...what? I'm not understanding what this statement is supposed to mean
I don't know how this devolved into an ExpressCard debate, but Thunderbolt can definitely replace expresscard:
Image
http://www.sonnettech.com/product/echoexpresscard34thunderbolt.html#
Even the more expensive model which less you use ExpressCard 2.0 cards is under $170.
In fact, with the new Retina MBP, you can have two of those adapters now.
Thunderbolt adapters dangle. There are ExpressCards which fit flush.
Even if not flush, ExpressCards do not dangle.