Hi, since the updated iMacs do not have a 4K display, does that mean that no laptop graphic card can drive one? I know that the current MBP can't but is it likely that the next generation will?
If you read the respective 4k thread, you'll see that the dGPU in current line is already capable:I know that the current MBP can't but is it likely that the next generation will?
A 17" Macbook Pro with a 8K display would be rather epic![]()
I'd be happy with a 4k res. They could just double the existing resolution :
1920 x 1200 -> 3840 x 2400
Future quote:
"Just one more thing....... The worlds first 4k laptop" - Tim Cook
I'd be happy with a 4k res. They could just double the existing resolution :
1920 x 1200 -> 3840 x 2400
Future quote:
"Just one more thing....... The worlds first 4k laptop" - Tim Cook
I run 3 screens at 1920 x 1080 on a 3 year old laptop and it runs extremely smooth. The GPU in my 3 year old laptop could easily handle a 4th 1920 x1080 screen if I had space on my desk.
So if my 3 year old laptop can handle 4k resolutions (4 1920 x1080 screens), than laptop GPU"s from 2013 should also easily do it.
Expect that's not 4k... That 1080p
4 screen running 1080p is not generating the same amount of pixels as 1 1080p screen. I don't have to explain that do I?
And it doesn't take a genius to figure out that 4 monitors running at 1080p resolution is running the same amount of pixels as a 4k resolution screen?
You try and run a game on 4k "with your labtop gpu" and tell me how that works
My laptop that is used in this setup is not intended for gaming since it has a workstation class GPU, instead of a consumer / gaming laptop GPU.
Why should I run games on 4K when it's intended for professional uses?
Then run 4k renders and or edits.
I run 3 screens at 1920 x 1080 on a 3 year old laptop and it runs extremely smooth. The GPU in my 3 year old laptop could easily handle a 4th 1920 x1080 screen if I had space on my desk.
So if my 3 year old laptop can handle 4k resolutions (4 1920 x1080 screens), than laptop GPU"s from 2013 should also easily do it.
4k needs some serious software optimization to work in OSx though, because the current retina is still pretty poorly optimized.
I'd be happy with a 4k res. They could just double the existing resolution :
1920 x 1200 -> 3840 x 2400
Future quote:
"Just one more thing....... The worlds first 4k laptop" - Tim Cook
Technically, that's quadrupling the resolution.
Why would I need to do that on this professional laptop? I don't work in the Arts industry.
I'd rather they not go 4K just yet. The rMBP had struggles with just the retina display, and for the large number of us who used one to replace the lack of a decent MacPro, it'll be hooked up to at least 2 external displays. 4k still isn't justifiable. Give it another year or two.
----------
This may seem like a silly question...why do you want 4k then when you cant really get any use out of it other than 'I've got 4k...awesome!'.
In that case you want a 17" laptop...not a 4k screenFor me it's because I just want anything that brings back the 17 inch.
Technically, that's quadrupling the resolution.
The rMBP had struggles with just the retina display
This may seem like a silly question...why do you want 4k then when you cant really get any use out of it other than 'I've got 4k...awesome!'.
In that case you want a 17" laptop...not a 4k screenWe dont need 4k to be present for a 17" laptop to be released.