Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

guzhogi

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Aug 31, 2003
3,820
2,000
Wherever my feet take me…
I was just thinking, it would be interesting to see someone make a RAID device of memory cards (like Secure Digital or Compact Flash or something). Just to see what kind of speed you can get. It'd be a REALLY small RAID, but who cares? It would also be cool if someone made like a 1U rack mount (or any U rack mount) and put space for however many SD cards can fit. I'm sure I'm not the 1st to think of something like this.
 
Wouldn't that be a lot slower than a standard hard drive? I guess I don't know much about it but USB 2.0 has a 480Mbps transfer speed. Thus if you hooked a SD-card RAID up to a system via USB, it would be significantly slower than the 3072Mbps speed that a SATA controller sports.
 
Does this count? P2 Memory Card

The P2 Card is essentially a RAID of SD memory cards with an LSI controller tightly packaged in a die-cast PC card (formerly PCMCIA) enclosure, so data transfer rate increases as memory capacity increases.

I don't really know anything else about them. My old roommate has one for his Panasonic HVX...
 
In terms of raw data thoroughput, most flash cards don't match the newest high-capacity, high RPM magnetic disks. Access time is much faster, yes, but that isn't something that is improved in a RAID array. Even the fastest "300x" UMDA CF cards top out at about 45MB/sec write, which isn't all that great.

By comparison my 750GB 7200.11's do about 110MB/sec - 70MB/sec write, and my current array averages about 200MB/sec (6 drives, RAID 0+1).

And that is with inexpensive consumer level 7200RPM drives. Step up to high-density SAS 15kRPM drives, and you're looking at data transfer rates as high as 200MB/sec write, and that's with a single drive.

If you're really insane, there are PCIe "ram drives", which use DDR2 DIMM's, and are basically limited only by the bus itself, and offer lightning quick access times, actually they're pretty much non-existant. The downside is that the RAM has to be kept powered, or else any data stored will be lost.

Unless you're going for something silent, or really need the access times, you're probably better of spending your money on large magnetic drives, which will not only be larger in capacity, but probably cheaper by the time you buy all the UMDA readers to go along with the cards.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.