Could some nice person explain to me what this "news" is about.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20146
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20146
I can think of a few reasons, which IIRC Microsoft has acknowledged. The original Xbox was really just an Intel-based PC with ROMs designed to prevent cracking, and being converted to "just an Intel-based PC." Not only can the Xbox run non-Xbox Intel software; once cracked, it is possible to run Xbox games on regular Intel-based PCs. With the PPC, clearly the Xbox 2 cannot be converted to "just an Intel-based PC," thus preserving the proprietary nature of the Xbox 2. The Xbox 2 must be able to run Xbox games in emulation. Apple, Insignia Solutions, and Connectix have already proven that the PPC is really great at emulation. Because the Xbox 2 runs on a Windows NT kernel, Microsoft experience with NT PPC gets a headstart in its transition to a non-Intel processor. Oh, how could I forget? The PPC is power efficient and inexpensive.5300cs said:Why is m$ going with a G5 chip? Does it whoop the pants of the other chips? If so I wonder how m$ feels about going PPC?Justice in a sense, maybe?
Reread my post to do your own research on the Xbox 2. The Xbox 2 is based on the Win NT kernel. MacOS X runs on the Mach kernel. The two are not the same.Dr. Dastardly said:So when this happens is it going to become a huge boom for the Mac gaming community? Will it be possible to see a direct X for Mac or at least someone doing a hack of some sort?
Its kinda interesting that an Apple processor will become one of the biggest gaming systems around.
MisterMe said:Reread my post to do your own research on the Xbox 2. The Xbox 2 is based on the Win NT kernel. MacOS X runs on the Mach kernel. The two are not the same.