Minor new Leopard Details...

[Sean7512]

http://reviews.cnet.com/Mac_OS_X_10...s_Release/4505-3673_7-32058772-2.html?tag=nav

I found this article this morning, it was written on 8/30 so it might not be anything new to some...but I found these little minor upgrades to be interesting!

 

[AvSRoCkCO1067]

http://reviews.cnet.com/Mac_OS_X_10...s_Release/4505-3673_7-32058772-2.html?tag=nav

I found this article this morning, it was written on 8/30 so it might not be anything new to some...but I found these little minor upgrades to be interesting!

Stupid CNET - Steve didn't say there were '10 top-secret' features remaining...rather, he introduced ONLY 10 of the features of Leopard.

 

[monke]

Pfftt, Mac Rumorian wannabe's

 

[displaced]

Pfftt, Mac Rumorian wannabe's

CNET is barely accurate when it comes to PC stuff. Their Mac-oriented output is even worse. They should really just call it quits and simply link to other sites that know their onions.

The whole piece is badly done, apparently written by someone with little day-to-day immersion in the Mac platform. Referring to Preview's new look, they mention "no more brushed metal here"... of course, Preview's never been a brushed-metal app. It's just a bad article.

 

[relimw]

Steve's keynote was more informative than that article.

 

[Zazaban]

I stopped reading when it said "10 top secret features"

 

[VanNess]

[C]omparably early builds of Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) also lacked many of the signature features of the final release.

What planet does these guys live on?

 

[imnotatfault]

What planet does these guys live on?

Planet PC. Or should I say, Dwarf Planet PC?

 

[Xander562]

CNET is barely accurate when it comes to PC stuff. Their Mac-oriented output is even worse. They should really just call it quits and simply link to other sites that know their onions.

I find this common with a lot of News companies, i find out stuff on the the internet, and when they report it, they mess some of the facts up.