Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mitthrawnuruodo said:
I'm with Marx on this one, it does look like offside...

Actually unless they changed nets at halftime I'm thinkin archimedes
scored on his own goal ... yikes what a dufus
of course socrates had the assist or was it socrates deflection

oh well I don't see how confiscious could have missed that...
 
Not sure why Martin luther put Karl Marx in..though.???
I wonder if they could have maybe put in Carl Jung...
I think Jung had a lot of interesting ideas....
He would have got a goal or two...
 
I i like english humor more then american humor, always have always will.
 
crazycat said:
I i like english humor more then american humor, always have always will.
Yup. some American humour is good (Friends and Scrubs) but you cant beat the good English humour.
 
The clip is a classic.

Wish Heidegger had a bigger role, though.

What bums you out about this, Swanny? Too pragmatic?

It's not that Hegel didn't have a point, it's just that he got caught up in wonder. Which isn't great when you have to figure out an irrigation system, but is otherwise pretty great.
 
thedude110 said:
The clip is a classic.

Wish Heidegger had a bigger role, though.

What bums you out about this, Swanny? Too pragmatic?

It's not that Hegel didn't have a point, it's just that he got caught up in wonder. Which isn't great when you have to figure out an irrigation system, but is otherwise pretty great.


well just that they forgot the cheerleaders...
Well cheerleaders are quite important part here in the west
along with the beer and pretzels
although I'm not a big pretzel fan
chips and peanuts though...

Actually what is the philosophy of cheerleading...???
Thats sort of like???? hmmmm
 
swanny said:
Not sure why Martin luther put Karl Marx in..though.???
I wonder if they could have maybe put in Carl Jung...
I think Jung had a lot of interesting ideas....
He would have got a goal or two...
Luther had to put Marx in. If he hadn't the score would have beed a real embarrassment for the Germans. Marx is the only one who could unite the team to a common effort for world victory . Substituting Jung for Nietzsche would have been a much better choice. The game might have been a draw. Every one knows that Nietzsche is not a team player.

One observation. Why wasn't Geiger playing? Even Goethe was absent? Playing those two would have helped the Germans tremendously. Strange.
 
iDrifter said:
Luther had to put Marx in. If he hadn't the score would have beed a real embarrassment for the Germans. Marx is the only one who could unite the team to a common effort for world victory . Substituting Jung for Nietzsche would have been a much better choice. The game might have been a draw. Every one knows that Nietzsche is not a team player.

One observation. Why wasn't Geiger playing? Even Goethe was absent? Playing those two would have helped the Germans tremendously. Strange.

Ye Nietzsche is a bit of a loner...
and depressed at that...
I guess Hitler didn't make the cut...
although he wasn't really a philospher
more of a politition....
can you imagine politions in this senario...

yikes....
jees I was eatin soup while I was watchin this not recommended

It is sublime
sublime I tell you...
 
iDrifter said:
One observation. Why wasn't Geiger playing? Even Goethe was absent? Playing those two would have helped the Germans tremendously. Strange.
Geiger was injured (groin strain, I believe), Goethe was suspended after reaching the yellow card limit in the previous match.

Bloody referees. :rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.