Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

More credibility for an LTE iPhone 5?

This doesn't even make sense. AT&T only has LTE in 5 cities: Atlanta, Chicago, San Antonio, Houston, and Dallas. They don't even have LTE active in San Francisco. Apple will not put LTE in the AT&T iPhone 5.

If they wanted to market it as "4G" on AT&T it will have HSPA+.
 
mlynchmob16 said:
This doesn't even make sense. AT&T only has LTE in 5 cities: Atlanta, Chicago, San Antonio, Houston, and Dallas. They don't even have LTE active in San Francisco. Apple will not put LTE in the AT&T iPhone 5.

If they wanted to market it as "4G" on AT&T it will have HSPA+.
Click to expand...

Key phrase from this worthless rumor. Glad a new thread was started to discuss it.

"It’s possible, however, that these LTE base station are simply to demonstrate AT&T’s 4G speeds when hooked up to an iPhone over Wi-Fi."

So, it might be, possibly, a simulated LTE connection using WiFi.
 
Yeah, it can't possibly be that they're having work done on their landlines. I mean, they would call the local telco for that. Who's the telco in San Francisco? What, it's at&t?! :eek: Still, they wouldn't be doing something major unless the store was being remodeled right? Wait what? It is?! :eek:

There was an at&t guy in front of my neighbor's house yesterday. That must mean he's getting an LTE base station too! :eek:
 
If there was a Pizza Hut van parked outside it would be rumored you could order pizza through a dedicated button on the new iPhone 5.
 
iPhone 5, 4G LTE speed, garbage battery life.

iPhone 4S, same 3G speed, same great battery life.

Choice!??? wouldn't really be like Apple though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back