Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Most reliable SSD for iMac 2011
- Thread starter olindacat
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I read that too. Is the 320 warranty still okay if I stripe, and can I? (Thinking one in OB w/Sata III cable from HDD swapped.)
He said it all right here, if you want reliability go with the Intel. It may not be the fastest but from a reliability standpoint nothing beats it.
I was just looking at the Vertex 3 as well but came to the same conclusion as you (based mainly on customer reviews). I'm just not willing to take the risk with an unreliable SSD due to having to re-tear into the iMac if any problems arise.
How does the Intel 320 compare to the 510 series?
Look, Intel 320 Series is the most reliable. Vertex 3 is not unreliable. It's very reliable, but not the most.
Intel 510 and 320 are about the same reliability for normal use, but it's designed for intense use, what you will not archive on normal desktop use.
ZeD: I read the 510 is Intel's performance answer, is that right? Then the 320 (as you said) is the safest bet, right?
They are about the same speed, as you can see on the AnandTech benchmarks.
The main difference is that the 510 Series are designed for server use.
The best cost effective: Intel 320 Series
OCZ Vertex 3 is my preference for the extra speed. If they were the same price of the Intel 320 Series, for sure they will be my choice.
As living in a **** country (Brazil), I need to pay 60% for the customs for the Product price + Shipping value, and my money worths about half of the Dollar, so Intel 320 is my choise.
Disconsidering price, of course OCZ Vertex 3 is a better choise. I doubt that you will have any problem with redability on them.
But of course, Intel 510, them 320 Series are the most reliable.
The main difference is that the 510 Series are designed for server use.
The best cost effective: Intel 320 Series
OCZ Vertex 3 is my preference for the extra speed. If they were the same price of the Intel 320 Series, for sure they will be my choice.
As living in a **** country (Brazil), I need to pay 60% for the customs for the Product price + Shipping value, and my money worths about half of the Dollar, so Intel 320 is my choise.
Disconsidering price, of course OCZ Vertex 3 is a better choise. I doubt that you will have any problem with redability on them.
But of course, Intel 510, them 320 Series are the most reliable.
In raid it will be even more faster and reliable.
But about the 510 Series: I dont think it will be more reliable in Desktop use. In server use (intense use, all the time) it will for sure be more reliable. It is intended to be. For desktop use you should use 320 Series.
There's no point to pick the 510 for Desktop.
But about the 510 Series: I dont think it will be more reliable in Desktop use. In server use (intense use, all the time) it will for sure be more reliable. It is intended to be. For desktop use you should use 320 Series.
There's no point to pick the 510 for Desktop.
In raid 0 you will distribute half of the file in each SSD, so it will be used less, to read or write (the problem of SSD are on write/delete).
Not if it is RAID 0 -in which case it will be 2x as unreliable.
Perhaps, but you also have twice the chance of failure. If one disk goes, all your data goes as well.
Talking about SSD you don't have "failures" as HDDs.
It can wear by use, writing/deleting files.
If your SSD last 1 month, it will probably last "forever" (comparing with an HDD) (at least for reading, if the write cycles wears).
You will probably throw it away before it loses your data by failure.
It can wear by use, writing/deleting files.
If your SSD last 1 month, it will probably last "forever" (comparing with an HDD) (at least for reading, if the write cycles wears).
You will probably throw it away before it loses your data by failure.
The Apple SSD. Order the 21.5 and have it shipped in two days. Add a Cinema Display and you're good to go.
Only if you break something during installation.
Problems that could be related to the SSD are also not covered.
You only void the warranty if you disassemble the internal cooling system. Apple marked those parts with stickers inside the system.
320 Series is actually faster at random speeds when compared with 510 Series
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/359?vs=357
In everyday usage, random speeds is what counts as that is what your usage mainly consists of. If sequential speeds were more important, then HDs would still be fine as they offer decent sequential speeds but horrible random speeds. It's also worth it to note that random speeds do not scale up when RAIDed so in this area, you won't gain a huge performance increase by using RAID 0.
510 Series uses Marvell controller so I would actually claim that it is not as reliable as 320 Series which uses Intel's own controller (same that is used in X25-M G2 series). The same Marvell controller is used in Crucial/Micron C400/M4 SSDs and the previous generation C300 lineup used a Marvell controller as well, albeit not the same. While Crucial's SSDs are not unreliable, I wouldn't say they are as reliable as Intel so due to this, I would again recommend the 320 Series for reliability.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/359?vs=357
In everyday usage, random speeds is what counts as that is what your usage mainly consists of. If sequential speeds were more important, then HDs would still be fine as they offer decent sequential speeds but horrible random speeds. It's also worth it to note that random speeds do not scale up when RAIDed so in this area, you won't gain a huge performance increase by using RAID 0.
510 Series uses Marvell controller so I would actually claim that it is not as reliable as 320 Series which uses Intel's own controller (same that is used in X25-M G2 series). The same Marvell controller is used in Crucial/Micron C400/M4 SSDs and the previous generation C300 lineup used a Marvell controller as well, albeit not the same. While Crucial's SSDs are not unreliable, I wouldn't say they are as reliable as Intel so due to this, I would again recommend the 320 Series for reliability.