Oh for god's sake. Does anyone even need this?
It would be great as a motion picture camera. Also as resolution becomes more and more detailed, we could reach a new level of realism. Yet another step in our artistic evolution. Whoa.![]()
Actually, this is not a bad thing. I'd love to see a super-high resolution as a broadcast standard, and it just downscales to a smaller TV; that leaves TV resolutions room to grow.
As far as movie formats, well, a single-layer Blu-ray movie is 25 GB. That is more than enough for an HD movie in MPEG-4. We've got dual-layer Blu-ray disks at 50 GB and in theory IIRC the format could expand to 8 layers- 200 GB per disk.
That should easily fit this movie on an existing disk.
The ridiculous thing about that resolution is that most movies are shot for theater-quality screens IIRC; meaning this resolution is actually probably higher than most cameras used in movies.
Now I want that resolution in an iPod![]()
Besides, if this is for home use, isn't this better than what the human eye can record? We will get to a point where increasing resolution/pixel density doesn't matter to our eyes, and we're already quite close.
Besides, if this is for home use, isn't this better than what the human eye can record? We will get to a point where increasing resolution/pixel density doesn't matter to our eyes, and we're already quite close.
Well of course! You bought your movies on VHS, then DVD, then Blu-Ray, didn't you? How else are they gonna get you to buy your movies a fourth time if they don't come out with another format?Oh for god's sake. Does anyone even need this?
Well of course! You bought your movies on VHS, then DVD, then Blu-Ray, didn't you? How else are they gonna get you to buy your movies a fourth time if they don't come out with another format?
Oh for god's sake. Does anyone even need this?