If iTunes lets you buy and own your music, and Napster/Yahoo/etc let you rent it... Why can't we have the best of both worlds and have a Rent-to-Own subscription option? For instance...
Say you pay $10 a month to subscribe, as with Napster, giving you access to the whole collection of music. But some portion of that fee, say half ($5) gets banked in store credit which you can then use to buy songs that you then own and can keep if/when you cancel your subscription.
This would provide the buyer with the chance to listen to all kinds of music with the reassurance that she is not totally locked into using the system forever (if she wants to have anything to show for the money she's spent). The seller would benefit because more people would be willing to subscribe, and they would gain the predictability and steady income that comes with the monthly rate.
This would be a way of making the subscription model more appealing, in light of its current unpopularity. It makes sense, since out of all the music you can listen to on Napster, you would only find so much a month that you would want to keep listening to over the long-term. The seller would be banking on people getting used to, hooked on, listening to anything in the collection, so that they would not drop the subscription. It would make it much easier for people to get into the subscription model/habit.
The kicker would be what percentage of the monthly fee would translate into store credit...
Might not be a bad option for Apple if they ever start feeling the heat from the subscription folks...
Say you pay $10 a month to subscribe, as with Napster, giving you access to the whole collection of music. But some portion of that fee, say half ($5) gets banked in store credit which you can then use to buy songs that you then own and can keep if/when you cancel your subscription.
This would provide the buyer with the chance to listen to all kinds of music with the reassurance that she is not totally locked into using the system forever (if she wants to have anything to show for the money she's spent). The seller would benefit because more people would be willing to subscribe, and they would gain the predictability and steady income that comes with the monthly rate.
This would be a way of making the subscription model more appealing, in light of its current unpopularity. It makes sense, since out of all the music you can listen to on Napster, you would only find so much a month that you would want to keep listening to over the long-term. The seller would be banking on people getting used to, hooked on, listening to anything in the collection, so that they would not drop the subscription. It would make it much easier for people to get into the subscription model/habit.
The kicker would be what percentage of the monthly fee would translate into store credit...
Might not be a bad option for Apple if they ever start feeling the heat from the subscription folks...