Hi all,
I bought the m3 2016 rMB a couple of weeks ago and I was debated during these weeks on whether to return it or not to wait for the new 13 MBPr in June.
The rMB is now used as a secondary machine to replace my Mid-2014 MBPr i7 15" in travels.
My main usage are basically scientific, so Excel, Word, Graphpad Prism, Papers (Reference Manager/PDF), R Studio, Keynote, LaTeX, Pixelmator/Affinity Designer, Windows 10 with Origin Pro-Excel with Parallels.
All these tasks were perfectly handled by the rMB, and I am very surprised by the performances. It only behave pretty bad with illogical tasks (open 300 PDF, open all the apps with a click, open 10 Prism analysis files), but these are conditions that nobody will ever use.
In everyday usage, with my tasks, I cannot see big differences between the rMB and the MBPr15. Tasks are performed really fast and the only noticeable difference is in the opening time of some apps, i.e. around 5.5 seconds to launch Power Point 2016 for rMB vs 4 for the MBPr, or 5.5 seconds to launch Pages vs 2.5 for MBPr. If apps are already open in background, the differences are really negligible.
The computational power for mathematical fittings is enough, with linear models, mono or bi-exponential models that are generated quite fast (too many variables here, didn't do precise tests), with also a quite low cpu usage. Very satisfied.
I did a test on a 4K video in Youtube, in Windows 10 with MS Edge Browser and nothing was working. I tried the same on my MBPr 15, and the performances were the same...a 4K video on youtube is not handled well by both virtual machines (MBPr:2 processors, 2048 mb RAM and 512 MB shared hardware with 3D acceleration, rMB:2 processors (?), 2048 Mb RAM, 512 Mb shared hardware, no 3D acceleration.).
The same video, run natively on Safari, was perfect. Again, I couldn't see the missing part in waiting for a new MBPr 13.
Battery life: I expected a little bit more here: from 5 to 6 hours in real life usage. 9-10 hours only in super-low light conditions (in a dark room) and only with web browsing, so situation that nobody experience in real life. With MS Office, the battery does not last 5 hours, but it is a software problem since also on the MBPr Word halves the battery life. However, I read that it can be charged from USB batteries and (maybe?) USB ports that are on planes. Did somebody test this?
Some tests with Pixelmator or Affinity Designer were satisfying. The problem is just the tiny screen, but it has the power to handle 1200 DPI, A4 size images perfectly, and this is what I need for scientific figures.
TL;DR: I am not returning the rMB m3, since it revealed to be a quite awesome machine for all the tasks I need. A 13 MBPr would have been an awesome machine, but still less powerful than the MPBr15 and not as portable as the rMB.
PRO: ultraportable, good performances,
CON: Price, I wouldn't have bought this if it wasn't for the edu discount and some discount at work (final price was about 990€). I believe that who bought the rMB, somehow will have contributed in keeping the redesigned MBPr prices down. Battery life could have been better.
Here a comparison for the size:
MBPr 15 Mid 2014, rMB m3 2016, iPad Air, BMW M5 E34.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36889/MBPrMB.JPG
Hope this post might help somebody in the same situation I was into
I bought the m3 2016 rMB a couple of weeks ago and I was debated during these weeks on whether to return it or not to wait for the new 13 MBPr in June.
The rMB is now used as a secondary machine to replace my Mid-2014 MBPr i7 15" in travels.
My main usage are basically scientific, so Excel, Word, Graphpad Prism, Papers (Reference Manager/PDF), R Studio, Keynote, LaTeX, Pixelmator/Affinity Designer, Windows 10 with Origin Pro-Excel with Parallels.
All these tasks were perfectly handled by the rMB, and I am very surprised by the performances. It only behave pretty bad with illogical tasks (open 300 PDF, open all the apps with a click, open 10 Prism analysis files), but these are conditions that nobody will ever use.
In everyday usage, with my tasks, I cannot see big differences between the rMB and the MBPr15. Tasks are performed really fast and the only noticeable difference is in the opening time of some apps, i.e. around 5.5 seconds to launch Power Point 2016 for rMB vs 4 for the MBPr, or 5.5 seconds to launch Pages vs 2.5 for MBPr. If apps are already open in background, the differences are really negligible.
The computational power for mathematical fittings is enough, with linear models, mono or bi-exponential models that are generated quite fast (too many variables here, didn't do precise tests), with also a quite low cpu usage. Very satisfied.
I did a test on a 4K video in Youtube, in Windows 10 with MS Edge Browser and nothing was working. I tried the same on my MBPr 15, and the performances were the same...a 4K video on youtube is not handled well by both virtual machines (MBPr:2 processors, 2048 mb RAM and 512 MB shared hardware with 3D acceleration, rMB:2 processors (?), 2048 Mb RAM, 512 Mb shared hardware, no 3D acceleration.).
The same video, run natively on Safari, was perfect. Again, I couldn't see the missing part in waiting for a new MBPr 13.
Battery life: I expected a little bit more here: from 5 to 6 hours in real life usage. 9-10 hours only in super-low light conditions (in a dark room) and only with web browsing, so situation that nobody experience in real life. With MS Office, the battery does not last 5 hours, but it is a software problem since also on the MBPr Word halves the battery life. However, I read that it can be charged from USB batteries and (maybe?) USB ports that are on planes. Did somebody test this?
Some tests with Pixelmator or Affinity Designer were satisfying. The problem is just the tiny screen, but it has the power to handle 1200 DPI, A4 size images perfectly, and this is what I need for scientific figures.
TL;DR: I am not returning the rMB m3, since it revealed to be a quite awesome machine for all the tasks I need. A 13 MBPr would have been an awesome machine, but still less powerful than the MPBr15 and not as portable as the rMB.
PRO: ultraportable, good performances,
CON: Price, I wouldn't have bought this if it wasn't for the edu discount and some discount at work (final price was about 990€). I believe that who bought the rMB, somehow will have contributed in keeping the redesigned MBPr prices down. Battery life could have been better.
Here a comparison for the size:
MBPr 15 Mid 2014, rMB m3 2016, iPad Air, BMW M5 E34.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36889/MBPrMB.JPG
Hope this post might help somebody in the same situation I was into
Last edited: