Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Drew n macs

macrumors member
Original poster
Apr 16, 2010
85
1
I have installed ssd in my mbp and now need a scratch disk. Any advice on a set up?

I will be editing on ilife 11 till the new final cut X comes out. I will be editing less than 16gb of video to at most 15 min video clips.

What do i need for a scratch disk? I will use a firewire port (800).

What size scratch disk do I need. Will I benefit from a SSD scratch disk since I am editing relitively small amount of video?

At this time a could pick up a ~100gb ish ssd relativly cheap. if this is not a good idea what specs should I get for a scratch disk? 2.5/3.5? 7200 rpm?

There was some post I found using Mroogle on scratch disk but the info seemed outdated.
 
Since the 16GB footage is most likely using some highly compressive codec like MPEG-4, iMovie will transcode the footage to another container/wrapper/format (.mov) and another, editing friendly, codec (Apple Intermediate Codec (AIC)), thus the file size will get bigger (up to 49GB per hour with 1080i60 footage).
FCP X will be able to edit the footage natively though.
An SSD might provide faster access times, as there are no platters to spin and a head to properly position, but it might not be necessary.
And FW800 is the fastest interface (besides Thunderbolt and Gigabit Ethernet) you can use.
 
Since the 16GB footage is most likely using some highly compressive codec like MPEG-4, iMovie will transcode the footage to another container/wrapper/format (.mov) and another, editing friendly, codec (Apple Intermediate Codec (AIC)), thus the file size will get bigger (up to 49GB per hour with 1080i60 footage).
FCP X will be able to edit the footage natively though.
An SSD might provide faster access times, as there are no platters to spin and a head to properly position, but it might not be necessary.
And FW800 is the fastest interface (besides Thunderbolt and Gigabit Ethernet) you can use.


I thought esata is faster than firewire? not thany many macs have the connection.
 
Last edited:
I thought esata is faster than firewire? not thany many macs have the connection.

Yes, eSATA is faster than FW800.
I assumed you had an older mobile Mac, as you didn't state what Mac you have.
I don't know why I thought that, must have been a remnant of another thread I visited earlier I suppose.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.