Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Net set for 'language shake-up' - domains in non-Latin character sets
- Thread starter edesignuk
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not a good idea, IMHO. Hope Google is prepared to translate. Otherwise the internet will basically be cut in half.
It's almost like having half the internet using a different numeric system...
It's almost like having half the internet using a different numeric system...
^ there are already websites in different languages, they're just forced to use Latin character sets for their domain names. This will just allow them to use their chosen language in their domain name choice too.
...at least that's how I'm seeing it?
...at least that's how I'm seeing it?
I don't understand how, say for example, a site in Korean will somehow become less accessible to me just because the domain name is also in Korean…
Right, but won't it effect a Latin character's user to find a non Latin website's domain name when searching, and vice versa?
And I don't know much about SEO, but don't domain names factor in?
I think it's great that non Latin users will be able to use their preferred language and native wording, but not if it fractures the internets by language.
And I don't know much about SEO, but don't domain names factor in?
I think it's great that non Latin users will be able to use their preferred language and native wording, but not if it fractures the internets by language.
But if you don't understand the language… finding that website is of little help surely. Even with Google Language tools etc.
^ I should think that might be a possibility, but I'd also expect most sites will maintain a Latin character set domain for this very reason.
This is where I think the problems would come in. We've all seen Engrish.com and the mess that could be made.
That makes a lot of sense.
In most cases, that's true, but travelers, business researchers, genealogists and the like may have more trouble. I'm none of these, BTW. Just speculating.
I'm also not sure if this is a good thing. It does seem like this will divide the internet. I know everything is based off of IP addresses with domain names linked to the IP Addresses...so, you could theoretically link to those numbers directly instead of the domain names. However, I can still foresee countries, people and businesses creating websites only in their local language script. Barring direct IP links, this presents problems for foreigners to easily gain access or view such sites.
Even if you don't know the local language, it's useful being able to easily view the sites anyway. Audio-visual content, layout,etc. might be important to reference. Also, even though website language translation is not perfect, you can still get the gist of what is on the page. With one standard naming convention, all people, everywhere, can access websites (IP/Domain blocking, non-withstanding). Once you start localizing domain structure, you loose this easy access and effectively cut off people.
Even if you don't know the local language, it's useful being able to easily view the sites anyway. Audio-visual content, layout,etc. might be important to reference. Also, even though website language translation is not perfect, you can still get the gist of what is on the page. With one standard naming convention, all people, everywhere, can access websites (IP/Domain blocking, non-withstanding). Once you start localizing domain structure, you loose this easy access and effectively cut off people.
The devaluing of Latin-based communication seems a slap especially at those that initially developed it! The money quote in question, "Of the 1.6 billion internet users today worldwide, more than half use languages that have scripts that are not Latin-based..." references simple "users" as opposed to tech "developers," and I think that if non-Latin character development wants to proceed it should be an adjunct tool to "users" who wish to communicate in Latin, not in place of it.
I stopped communicating in Latin after high school
This seems like a way for ICANN to now sell all the same domains again, only this time in differing character sets. What happens when there is a name collision, albeit in differing character sets when one or both of the websites decide to expand into the other character set? If the Kanji equivalent of McDonalds.com (a common name in Japan for sure!) decides it wants to have a Latin-based domain point to their site, or worse Billions and Billions served wants to have a Kanji-based domain point back to the home of the Big Mac, who gets the domain rights?
I just thought of something else... will there be new top level domains in these new non-latin character sets? If so, think of the fun in mixing and matching to get around web-squatters... [kanji domain].com or my_domain.[kanji equiv. of dot com]. Maybe [kanji domain].[arabic equiv. of dot com]. Big corporations will have to buy hundreds of new domain combinations to protect their trademarks.
True, but the alternative is worse. Without this change, everyone in those countries is having to use addresses in scripts they're not familiar with.
At least with these changes, it'll be easier for the majority of people using those sites.
Wirelessly posted (Nokia 5800 Tube XpressMusic : Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Nokia5800d-1/21.0.101; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413)
I understand that some of you don't like this idea, but I also think it's a bit self-serving to say that over half the users in this world who write using other scripts should just sound out their company name using a foreign alphabet, and ask citizens/consumers to do the same, some with great difficulty, because you happen to be comfortable with how things are.
Welcome to the Westernised world, I guess.
I understand that some of you don't like this idea, but I also think it's a bit self-serving to say that over half the users in this world who write using other scripts should just sound out their company name using a foreign alphabet, and ask citizens/consumers to do the same, some with great difficulty, because you happen to be comfortable with how things are.
Welcome to the Westernised world, I guess.
^ Spare me. This is taking a standard that's been in place since the beginning and throwing it out the window. It might not only screw up global searching, it could make every internet user extremely vulnerable to spoofing attacks.
Internationalized domain name
ICANN's out for another land grab. It's all about the Benjamin's or rupees or نقود.
Internationalized domain name
ICANN's out for another land grab. It's all about the Benjamin's or rupees or نقود.
Wirelessly posted (Nokia 5800 Tube XpressMusic : Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Nokia5800d-1/21.0.101; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413)
Well things can change. Just that the advantaged obviously don't want it.
Besides, what you said is like saying everything was designed perfectly at the beginning. Well, we've come to a point where it isn't, so if some of the fear-mongering actually comes true, well then I'm willing to take a step back to make many strides towards a fairer internet for over over half the internet users in the world.
Well things can change. Just that the advantaged obviously don't want it.
Besides, what you said is like saying everything was designed perfectly at the beginning. Well, we've come to a point where it isn't, so if some of the fear-mongering actually comes true, well then I'm willing to take a step back to make many strides towards a fairer internet for over over half the internet users in the world.