Hahaha, no kidding. Well, wait, that wouldn't really work, would it? I mean aren't Apple's displays PCs and Mac compatible?puckhead193 said:maybe they can add an isight to them?
lilstewart92 said:Hahaha, no kidding. Well, wait, that wouldn't really work, would it? I mean aren't Apple's displays PCs and Mac compatible?
The iSight couldn't work on the PC unless they wrote a driver for it in which I doubt they would.
lilstewart92 said:Hahaha, no kidding. Well, wait, that wouldn't really work, would it? I mean aren't Apple's displays PCs and Mac compatible?
The iSight couldn't work on the PC unless they wrote a driver for it in which I doubt they would.
lilstewart92 said:Hahaha, no kidding. Well, wait, that wouldn't really work, would it? I mean aren't Apple's displays PCs and Mac compatible?
The iSight couldn't work on the PC unless they wrote a driver for it in which I doubt they would.
calebjohnston said:Maybe they'll add ports to it and close that gap between them and 2005fpw's?
calebjohnston said:Maybe they'll add ports to it and close that gap between them and 2005fpw's?
odedia said:They could really use an upgrade to the response time of the Cinema displays. It is currently 16ms i think, while most competition is below the 12ms. Very important for video/games.
Oded S.
~Shard~ said:There is room for improvements. The 20" iMac has a better screen right now than the 20" cinema display, so there's one big area for improvement right there.![]()
p0intblank said:And not to mention pros like to use Apple's displays, so I can't see them holding off THAT much longer.
jaysmith said:i think they should consider a 17" widescreen display, with around 1400 x 900 res. something cheaper than the 899 base priced 20"ers.
hmm..jaysmith said:i think they should consider a 17" widescreen display, with around 1400 x 900 res. something cheaper than the 899 base priced 20"ers.