New build of Tiger in the wild
It supposedly has the new iChat AV U+3
Build number is 8A268/8A269.
It supposedly has the new iChat AV U+3
Build number is 8A268/8A269.
stevehaslip said:does it still have those blue aqua things in the top corners of the menu bar?
grabberslasher said:Many of you probably know this by now, but for those who don't there's a new build of Tiger (same one AppleInsider is using) being leaked to the general MTKA public.
It supposedly has the new iChat AV U+3
Build number is 8A268/8A269 and the disk image is approx. 2Gbs
And I have significant proof from the disk to believe it. Brilliant!
ChrisFromCanada said:You know you are really asking for it. Here come the flames.
bux said:I still don't know why non-developers would like a "unstable" OS...
And if you really need it, you should join ADC and get it legally.
I understand that's why... but I don't get it. I'm an ADC member, I've got Tiger running at times, I think it's got some cool features, but I don't understand why (legal or illegal) access to the latest version is something to crow about. Tiger's nice. But it's a long, long, long way from being ready, many things that run on Panther crash on it, a lot of the new features are still half baked, etc.Blue Velvet said:Bragging rights. Otherwise, why post here?
To quote:
"And I have significant proof from the disk to believe it. Brilliant!"
When making the comparison with why non-developers download and trust in betas of Firefox (i.e. Firefox 0.93), you get many of the same reasons. The software isn't finalized, some features benefit over other versions of the software, and you get to learn more about how the software works before everyone else (sorta like opening your holiday gifts early).bux said:I still don't know why non-developers would like a "unstable" OS...
grabberslasher said:![]()
This is a forums for talking about Tiger, but when I say that there will soon be another build to talk about people start flaming.
Crazy
grabberslasher said:New Tiger Build Leaked!
rendezvouscp said:This leak is good for legal developers too. Many developers need to see these new features that aren't in the WWDC copy of Tiger.
JFreak said:actually, no, if it's not released by apple then it's still "work in progress" that may (and often will) still change in the future - 3rd party developers need to work with something that will be in the final release.
Well, I think anyone that obtains Tiger needs to realize that if their installation destroys life on this planet, it isn't Apple's fault because it's beta software, and as such Apple isn't legally accountable.JFreak said:actually, no, if it's not released by apple then it's still "work in progress" that may (and often will) still change in the future - 3rd party developers need to work with something that will be in the final release.
JFreak said:i don't want to see tiger released before wwdc 2005
cb911 said:i guess because you want to see Tiger come out as a fully developed, bugless (as possible) operating system?
JFreak said:exactly - panther was useless before 10.3.4 and it seems 10.3.5 is not good either. (by useless i mean pro audio work and not simple textedit use)
I'd say JFreak's comment was just overly broad, not exaggerated. I'd rephrase it as something like this:stevehaslip said:i understand what you're saying, that for your use i wasn't as good as you'd expected or wanted. But panther wasn't "useless" straight out of the box it ran photoshop and hell of a lot more without any updates what so ever. How can you possibly say its useless?
Sure there are always things to be improved etc but your comment seems like a major exageration.![]()