DavidMarks
macrumors member
...in fact, there's no practical way to search the browsing history. 
When I saw the thread title, I thought maybe it was a good thing as searching my history on a 2.9 GHZ i7 with 8 GB MBP brings it to its knees (though, not as bad as searching Messages)! I always thought the coverflow trying to load so many images was the problem.
What do you mean when you say there is no practical way to search now? That there is no search or that you can't preview like you could before?
So no way to see even recent history?!![]()
No...I used this a lot. Probably the only useful instance of Cover Flow. Hope they add something equivalent and it's just not there yet.
Coverflow was completely useless and just took up memory, did anyone even use it?
All you really needed was just a page with all your history and a way to search for it, and that's what we have now.
Why didn't you like Coverflow? I loved it; okay so it wasn't perfect, and performance left a lot to be desired, but as a means of quickly flipping through pages of stuff visually it was pretty nice.I just noticed this!Damn! I hated Cover Flow in general too, but also really, really liked looking through my history in this way. It helped me spot what I was looking for much quicker.
Why didn't you like Coverflow? I loved it; okay so it wasn't perfect, and performance left a lot to be desired, but as a means of quickly flipping through pages of stuff visually it was pretty nice.
I was shocked when it was removed from iTunes as it was my favourite way of picking a something to play when I just didn't know what I was in the mood for.
My main gripe was that in iTunes it didn't really need to have that list underneath too, just needed a quick-search and the ability to open albums once you find one. Could have been an awesome, touch-centric (but still fun with a mouse) feature if Apple had developed it instead of scrapping it.
Now the only place it's left is the Finder but I'm not sure I expect it to stay there either, but it's a great way again for flicking though folders of images. Unless Apple wants to give us something different, or an easier way for setting image folders with nice big icon previews without screwing up all of our Finder windows, but that's never been one of the Finder's strong points![]()
The problem with that though is that you need to know some terms for what you're looking for; if you read an article of a product, but forget what the product was called then suddenly the search is harder. Flicking through meant you could recognise something from the article without needing to know specific search terms.You can most definitely still search using the status bar in the History window..
The problem with that though is that you need to know some terms for what you're looking for; if you read an article of a product, but forget what the product was called then suddenly the search is harder. Flicking through meant you could recognise something from the article without needing to know specific search terms.
It's a pretty big step back actually; not saying that search from the address bar isn't great, but it isn't always enough.
If that was the case - then why is Top Sites still available ?Perhaps to gain speed and reduce mem use.
Coverflow was completely useless and just took up memory, did anyone even use it?
All you really needed was just a page with all your history and a way to search for it, and that's what we have now.
I use it every day many times, to put my pictures to the forum, or on my website, to choose the pictures for fb, etc,Coverflow was completely useless and just took up memory, did anyone even use it?
All you really needed was just a page with all your history and a way to search for it, and that's what we have now.