Dante, you seem very informed about these displays after following several of your posts.
I currently have a MBP 17" from August 07. The display is great, but as my workload has increased I am looking at the 23" ACD for ergonomics and productivity. I am a designer, with my workload balance being about 80% print, 20% web.
I have been looking at the 23" for a while, but waiting until MWSF to see what happens. With today's announcement of the new Pro's with no new display, I feel we will not see an update, as you said earlier.
You have stated that the current 30" is great for print. How does the 23" stack up, assuming you have had experience with it as well? Should I go ahead and pull the trigger even if we don't see a new model/price drop at MWSF?
My brother is a professional newspaper and magazine photographer who displays his images in both print and web formats.
I am a print, web and broadcast producer.
Both my brother, other I know, and I, have the ACD 23".
It is regarded as more consistent than the ACD 30 in terms of color consistency across the screen width.
The gamut of the ACD 23" is turned for SWOP (Standard Web Offset Press) Print standards. This display is "Spot On" for this Gamut. It has a great combination of brightness, contrast, screen coating and gamut for print.
It is an S-IPS display with great sharpness.
It is not a wide gamut S-IPS panel like the Dell 24." However, unless you calibrate a wide gamut display down for print, the color of these wide gamut units is often unrealistic for print.
Anandtech has excellent articles on this topic: they have taken many wide gamut S-IPS displays with newer panels than the ACD 23 and have calibrated them for print use. By all means they do great, but often have higher gamut differences between adjacent colors (called Delta E) than a calibrated ACD does.
Bottom line: the ACD is an excellent monitor for the money if you can get if for a refurbished or education price of $799. At retail of nearly $900, it is expensive and lacks features such as HDCP (for DRM protected Blue Ray and HD content), multiple inputs, etc, but its image quality FOR PRINT is excellent.
I would buy one after MacWorld if you need it.
The size difference between a 23 and 24 is not really significant. A 24 has the same pixel density spread out over a slightly larger panel.
Thumbs up for the ACD!
Note: a lot of people disagree with me on this point and that's fine.