Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Office 2004 vs Office v.X

M

mckeek

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 5, 2004
25
0
I just bought a nice shiny new PowerBook 1.33 (love it!) and need Office. I keep reading that 2004 is slower that its predecessor (typical MS behaviour) and the few added features are not worth the performance hit. Since I use only about 10% of the features in Office at work (on a PC) I am fishing for opinions - are the stories of 2004 being slow true, and if so, should I get tried and true V.X instead?

TIA,

- Kevin
 
mckeek said:
I just bought a nice shiny new PowerBook 1.33 (love it!) and need Office. I keep reading that 2004 is slower that its predecessor (typical MS behaviour) and the few added features are not worth the performance hit. Since I use only about 10% of the features in Office at work (on a PC) I am fishing for opinions - are the stories of 2004 being slow true, and if so, should I get tried and true V.X instead?

TIA,

- Kevin
Click to expand...

I've used both, and I'd say that if you dont use any of the new shiny features then buy the one that is the cheapest. I can't say for me there has been any benefit, like you i dont use many features apart from simple formulas in excel and basic word processing in word.

jay
 
I haven't seen a performance problem with Office 2004 over v.X. However, I have to throw some caveats in there. I don't use Office to do large documents or spreadsheets (at home anyway, and my work computer is a PC.) So, I've rarely done anything with Office to tax the system. Also, not long before I bought Office 2004 I upgraded my Dual 450Mhz to a Dual 1300Mhz.

Anyway, my personal experience has been fine, but I've only done simple things in Excel and Word. Entourage I use extensively and I think it's running fine. I had to adjust my rules a smidgeon for my .Mac IMAP account and my Hotmail account. Now that I have, though, Entourage identifies spam, moves into the Junk Mail folder on the respective servers and only downloads my real email. I have never gotten more than 2 spam messages in one day, but it's nice to have even less to take care of.
 
mckeek said:
I just bought a nice shiny new PowerBook 1.33 (love it!) and need Office. I keep reading that 2004 is slower that its predecessor (typical MS behaviour) and the few added features are not worth the performance hit. Since I use only about 10% of the features in Office at work (on a PC) I am fishing for opinions - are the stories of 2004 being slow true, and if so, should I get tried and true V.X instead?

TIA,

- Kevin
Click to expand...

I've used both and 2004 is slower as far as opening a app, but does that really matter? It slower doesn't mean is slow as takes 2min to open it.
 
I saw these tips to speed Word up a bit. I only tried the word count one, as I would rather keep the others as features. Still:

1. Disable Live Word Count (Preferences: View)
2. Disable Quartz Text Smoothing (Preferences: General)
3. Disable WYSIWYG font and style menus (Preferences: General)
Click to expand...
 
wowser said:
Disable Quartz Text Smoothing (Preferences: General)
Click to expand...

I've always had problems with MS Word in Mac OS X, especially with the software being able to keep up with my typing. So I tried your suggestions and found I'd already disabled Quartz Text Smoothing. Just for kicks, I enabled it to see if there was a big difference. Here's what I found:

1. The text looks WAY better. A huge difference.
2. It's FASTER than with Quartz Smoothing disabled.

So my recommendation, assuming your graphics card can handle Quartz, is to ENABLE text smoothing. MS Word is usable again!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back