viewfly macrumors 65816 Original poster May 1, 2009 1,263 24 Nov 21, 2012 #1 I feel that the oleophobic iPhone 5 coating is improved over the 4 and 4S coatings. They were good but the 5 seems better. Anyone agree?
I feel that the oleophobic iPhone 5 coating is improved over the 4 and 4S coatings. They were good but the 5 seems better. Anyone agree?
tgi macrumors 65816 Aug 29, 2012 1,331 330 Nov 21, 2012 #2 Is that the anti-figerprint coating? I have not noticed a difference on the 5. Still gets a lot of figerprints.
Is that the anti-figerprint coating? I have not noticed a difference on the 5. Still gets a lot of figerprints.
J JayLenochiniMac macrumors G5 Nov 7, 2007 12,819 2,390 New Sanfrakota Nov 21, 2012 #4 What's your basis for that? If you're comparing brand new iPhone 5 to a year old 4S and two years old 4, of course it'll be better because the oleophobic coating wears down over time.
What's your basis for that? If you're comparing brand new iPhone 5 to a year old 4S and two years old 4, of course it'll be better because the oleophobic coating wears down over time.
viewfly macrumors 65816 Original poster May 1, 2009 1,263 24 Nov 21, 2012 #5 Comparing to my memory of my new 4 and 4S. Based on ease of removing smudges and lack of smudges accumulating.
Comparing to my memory of my new 4 and 4S. Based on ease of removing smudges and lack of smudges accumulating.
numberforty1 macrumors 6502 Oct 6, 2012 402 0 Canada Nov 21, 2012 #6 maybe your hands are cleaner lately.