Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gugucom

macrumors 68020
Original poster
May 21, 2009
2,136
2
Munich, Germany
I noticed that my Supertalent MEs were experiencing massive speed loss in tests when file size fell under 32k and set my strip size accordingly. If I remember right I went to 64k.

When I cloned my OS X drive I got something like 30 MB/s average and initally it was down at 10. Later when I was copying Gigabyte files (Winclone images) it got up to 110 MB/s peak value.

I have no simmillar info for my new Intels 2nd gen. So provisionally I'll be using a simillar value.

I also noticed that Windows disk management program uses 4128k as a standard which appears massive and probably usefull for HDDs.

Could somebody with more in depth knowledge advise a rational choice for OS x and Windows for different SSDs?
 
I noticed that my Supertalent MEs were experiencing massive speed loss in tests when file size fell under 32k and set my strip size accordingly. If I remember right I went to 64k.

When I cloned my OS X drive I got something like 30 MB/s average and initally it was down at 10. Later when I was copying Gigabyte files (Winclone images) it got up to 110 MB/s peak value.

I have no simmillar info for my new Intels 2nd gen. So provisionally I'll be using a simillar value.

I also noticed that Windows disk management program uses 4128k as a standard which appears massive and probably usefull for HDDs.

Could somebody with more in depth knowledge advise a rational choice for OS x and Windows for different SSDs?
Internally, SSD's are using 4KB pages, but to the system blocks are 512KB, or 128 pages per block.

128 pages * 4KB = 512KB for the stripe yeilds the best results.

I've also seen 512 used in an article or two.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.