Cnet has great performance numbers, better sampling, clear winner...
http://www.cnet.com/products/apple-iphone-6/
http://www.cnet.com/products/apple-iphone-6/
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Performance: 6s vs 6
- Thread starter packgolfdude
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Wow, that reviewer sure threw a zinger.
"You're not losing anything much with the 6. But it's not the absolute top of the line. Maybe that bugs you. If it does, get the 6 Plus."
Is he a MacRumors regular?
"You're not losing anything much with the 6. But it's not the absolute top of the line. Maybe that bugs you. If it does, get the 6 Plus."
Is he a MacRumors regular?
The CNET reviewer captures my own debate between the two exactly.
The CNET review also captures it correctly, there SHOULD be better performance from the 6 compared to the 6 Plus, its smaller resolution despite having the same everything else without tablet mode. It is expected. Whether or not the drop in performance is worth it for the size, battery, camera, and screen resolution is another story.
The CNET review also captures it correctly, there SHOULD be better performance from the 6 compared to the 6 Plus, its smaller resolution despite having the same everything else without tablet mode. It is expected. Whether or not the drop in performance is worth it for the size, battery, camera, and screen resolution is another story.
Agreed, was trying to figure out how the 6s could outperform the 6 with the same processor/memory.
Yes, but Apple is known for messing with the clock rates to achieve fluid performance while maximizing battery life. So it's entirely possible they clocked them differently. Or not. We'll have to wait for better data.
