Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

timlevin

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 24, 2010
5
0
Does anyone know how the performance compares between (1) an external hard disk connected with eSATA, through a PCIE card, and (2) the same disk connected directly to Firewire 800? Is there some data about this?

-Tim
 
FW800 will be around 60 mb/s max while eSATA will be as fast as the harddrives allows it to (current 500 gb / 7200 rpm 2.5" drives reach around 110 mb/s max).
 
I usually get ~77MB/sec out of FW800. My disks max out before they can saturate eSATA, but it is theoretically capable of 250MB/sec on the expresscard bus (2.5 gigabit). I've seen over 130MB/sec sustained to my 1TB disks.

The Sonnet Tempo Edge eSATA card seems to be able 125MB/sec read and 110MB/sec write. The expensive Sonnet Tempo Pro is capable of up to 200MB/sec.
 
Does anyone know how the performance compares between (1) an external hard disk connected with eSATA, through a PCIE card, and (2) the same disk connected directly to Firewire 800? Is there some data about this?

-Tim

Are you gonna use one normal (not SSD or Raid) external HD?
In that case the speed differences won't be much.
 
Are you gonna use one normal (not SSD or Raid) external HD?
In that case the speed differences won't be much.

I have two HDs, a 1TB "black caviar" western digital and a 1TB Seagate 7200.11 in a single external enclosure connected by a (eSATA/FW/USB) cable. Since there are two HDs driving the data, perhaps eSATA is a better choice?

-Tim
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.