R rsasp macrumors newbie Original poster Nov 3, 2010 1 0 Nov 3, 2010 #1 Just bought this recently and installed Windows 7. The following screen shot under WEI Macbook Air 2010 13'' 1.86GHz 4GB RAM 256GB The performance is quite amazing consider its 1.86GHz CPU, I bet 2.13GHz CPU would score bit higher. Attachments mba13-2010.jpg 276.4 KB · Views: 1,435
Just bought this recently and installed Windows 7. The following screen shot under WEI Macbook Air 2010 13'' 1.86GHz 4GB RAM 256GB The performance is quite amazing consider its 1.86GHz CPU, I bet 2.13GHz CPU would score bit higher.
revelated macrumors 6502a Jun 30, 2010 994 2 Nov 3, 2010 #2 rsasp said: Just bought this recently and installed Windows 7. The following screen shot under WEI Macbook Air 2010 13'' 1.86GHz 4GB RAM 256GB The performance is quite amazing consider its 1.86GHz CPU, I bet 2.13GHz CPU would score bit higher. Click to expand... It wouldn't. WEI rates based on the lowest scoring component - in this case the GPU. Getting a faster processor would still be a 5.3 in that case. Not a terrible score, just saying it wouldn't go up as the GPU is the holdup.
rsasp said: Just bought this recently and installed Windows 7. The following screen shot under WEI Macbook Air 2010 13'' 1.86GHz 4GB RAM 256GB The performance is quite amazing consider its 1.86GHz CPU, I bet 2.13GHz CPU would score bit higher. Click to expand... It wouldn't. WEI rates based on the lowest scoring component - in this case the GPU. Getting a faster processor would still be a 5.3 in that case. Not a terrible score, just saying it wouldn't go up as the GPU is the holdup.
P Perdification macrumors regular Sep 22, 2010 202 0 Nov 3, 2010 #3 I think what the OP meant was that the individual score for the CPU would go up.
M Maven1975 macrumors 65816 Aug 24, 2008 1,041 310 Nov 3, 2010 #4 Sony Z - 2.4 i5 - 330M Attachments C__Users_Anthony_AppData_Local_Temp_PrintPreview.pdf 53.3 KB · Views: 429