Is the new 12" MacBook comparable to a 13" MBA in terms of performance? I am particularly interested in the HD video playback abilities of the MacBook - HD Youtube and Netflix. Will the new MacBook be able to handle long hours of video playback without thermal throttling and/or skipped frames? I am worried about this especially given the lack of a cooling fan on this model.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Performance wise how does the 12" MacBook compare with a 13" MacBook Air?
- Thread starter saintforlife
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I think there are a lot of opinions on this, but I don't think anyone's received a MacBook yet, so there are no actual benchmarks to use for comparison.
Hard to imagine that Apple would release a computer that couldn't just playback video. A bigger question is how will it perform at more intense tasks like ripping DVDs. My 2013 MBA rips a DVD in 15 minutes and the same DVD takes 75 minutes to rip on my 2008 MBP (core2 duo). But the fans start racing on the MBA when I do this kind of thing.
Will be interesting to see how the rMB handles this.
Will be interesting to see how the rMB handles this.
Based on the CPU synthetic test the rMB out performs the MBA
http://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-intel_core_m_5y71-453-vs-intel_core_i5_4260u-423
http://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-intel_core_m_5y71-453-vs-intel_core_i5_4260u-423
Performance will be a function of the CPU, the thermal management structure of the chassis and boards, and environment. So, I guess you will have to wait for some real world feedback from early adopters to get a good answer to your question. Synthetic benchmarks may not tell you the whole story - and it is up to you to decide whether you want to spend $1200+ without an answer.
Video playback will be alright. It will be more efficient than the last gen macbook airs due to the integrated audio dsp.
In fact, apple has rated the macbook at 10 hours of video playback.
If an iPad air (2) can playback 1080p video with a tablet-class processor with no cooling fans, I'd imagine the rMB could do it without breaking sweat. The iPad's screen resolution is also very close to that of the rMB, so no one machine is at a disadvantage in terms of driving the display. Of course, the rMB's CPU is a full-blown processor that runs OS X rather than iOS, so I'd guess that it is in general a bit more powerful than the iPad's. I wouldn't worry that the rMB would struggle to play HD video. However for 4K content, I'm not so sure.
Thats for a single core, Multi core is 2.2Ghz by design.
M CPUs run at different speeds for the two workloads.
Will it be 100% accurate? We don't right now is the only truthful thing to say at this stage. But i still believe its a very good indicator.
M CPUs run at different speeds for the two workloads.
Will it be 100% accurate? We don't right now is the only truthful thing to say at this stage. But i still believe its a very good indicator.
Last edited:
Looking at Geekbench multicore scores, the 2012 Air is faster than both Haswell Airs. I know Geekbench isn't the only indicator but I would be happy if the Core M was as fast as a Haswell Air. I'm sure the 1.3 GHz is faster than the 2013 base Air.
Odd, I saw a comparison elsewhere saying that it was comparable to a 2011 MBA. Is the 2011 MBA similar to the 2014 MPA?
I think the comparisons with the 2011 MBA were with the top of the range model from 2011 which is rather unfair.
Get one and test drive it hard for 15 days. Bring it back if it doesn't meet your particular needs. For a lot of people, it will.
That's data on paper, let us see how it performs in practice. Five more days to go.