On an older MBA there are three partitions.
Initially one held the original OS (Mavericks MBA1), another was used for Data (MBA3) and the third reserved. Mavericks does and has always been trouble free.
We recently installed El Capitan in the empty partition (MBA2). Terminal reveals that such partition is Core Storage unlike the other two partitions. We do not know if this has always been the case. All are HFS+, drive is Apple PCIe.
While Capitan runs fine there are some quirks:
Finder window sidebar display
Guest folders not accessible
System library can not be written to
GUI computer name differs from Terminal
So... is using the 'Core Storage' partition to boot from the issue? And why is this not the same as the other partitions?
Thanks in advance for your comments!
Below from Mavericks DU & Sharing
below from El Capitan, note sidebar
Initially one held the original OS (Mavericks MBA1), another was used for Data (MBA3) and the third reserved. Mavericks does and has always been trouble free.
We recently installed El Capitan in the empty partition (MBA2). Terminal reveals that such partition is Core Storage unlike the other two partitions. We do not know if this has always been the case. All are HFS+, drive is Apple PCIe.
While Capitan runs fine there are some quirks:
Finder window sidebar display
Guest folders not accessible
System library can not be written to
GUI computer name differs from Terminal
So... is using the 'Core Storage' partition to boot from the issue? And why is this not the same as the other partitions?
Thanks in advance for your comments!
Below from Mavericks DU & Sharing
below from El Capitan, note sidebar
Last edited: