If the WSJ's "person familiar with the matter" turns out to be wrong about the 800 things he or she has said in the past week, they better hide out in a bungalow somewhere.
The WSJ must be very confident in this "person" to write a dozen or so front page articles with his or her information, right?
The WSJ must be very confident in this "person" to write a dozen or so front page articles with his or her information, right?