Q quaddi macrumors newbie Original poster Oct 22, 2021 1 0 Oct 22, 2021 #1 Its a big one no doubt about that, but does anyone have the physical dimensions of the brick yet?
A alee macrumors 6502a Jul 13, 2008 856 1,302 New York, NY Oct 22, 2021 #2 Here it is against the 96W. No dimensions yet. Attachments 558D4974-D48A-4513-B07B-CE9560FC89AF.jpeg 56.8 KB · Views: 96 Reactions: zakarhino, CheesePuff, arn and 1 other person
A alee macrumors 6502a Jul 13, 2008 856 1,302 New York, NY Oct 22, 2021 #3 Doing a little estimation... it's probably 3.6" x 3.1". So short answer... it isn't that big. Comparable to the 96W.. marginally larger but more than 40% increase in power at 140W output. Attachments new.jpg 52.3 KB · Views: 87
Doing a little estimation... it's probably 3.6" x 3.1". So short answer... it isn't that big. Comparable to the 96W.. marginally larger but more than 40% increase in power at 140W output.
zakarhino Contributor Sep 13, 2014 2,662 7,138 Oct 22, 2021 #4 alee said: Here it is against the 96W. No dimensions yet. Click to expand... It’s actually not that big then. Somehow I was under the impression it would be the size of a shoe. Reactions: tdbrown75
alee said: Here it is against the 96W. No dimensions yet. Click to expand... It’s actually not that big then. Somehow I was under the impression it would be the size of a shoe.
A alee macrumors 6502a Jul 13, 2008 856 1,302 New York, NY Oct 22, 2021 #5 zakarhino said: It’s actually not that big then. Somehow I was under the impression it would be the size of a shoe. Click to expand... Yeah certainly not tiny, but should be comparable in size to the power bricks we've been hauling. A bit more rectangular in shape.
zakarhino said: It’s actually not that big then. Somehow I was under the impression it would be the size of a shoe. Click to expand... Yeah certainly not tiny, but should be comparable in size to the power bricks we've been hauling. A bit more rectangular in shape.