Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I removed the two you mentioned. Let us know if you have other suggestions.
How about this one? The whole Bendgate fiasco has largely faded into obscurity.
Screenshot 2021-04-17 2.45.32 PM.png
 
I'll have thought this no longer needs to be a sticky:

While this is debatable:

On the other hand, this seems like the sort of thread that should be one but is not:
 
I'll have thought this no longer needs to be a sticky:

While this is debatable:

On the other hand, this seems like the sort of thread that should be one but is not:
I’d suggest that the Mac Pro 4,1 and 5,1 upgrade thread discussion either remain stickied in the Mac Pro thread for a while longer or gets moved and stickied to the Early Intel sub forum.

It seems those Mac Pro machines are still quite capable today and may be for the next few years. Not everyone with one ram out and bought the trash can Mac Pro.

However one could argue that due to their age (4,1 was 2009 and 5,1 was 2010-2012) that maybe they belong in the early Intel forum? I can’t see many people using these for more than 2-3 more years though.
 
That is not a cMP thread as it was started for the 2013 version and in any case, most of the recent posts refer to the nMP.

Regardless, a thread for people to simply announce ordering or otherwise obtaining a computer is a poor use of sticky space (It is not an "upgrade" thread). This is with the nMP (2019) in mind ... talk less of older examples.

Was probably a good idea to stop people opening multiple threads to tell us they have ordered the 2013 back then and got a new lease of life with the 2019. Even with the 2019, such a thread is now stale. It can exist but should not be a sticky.

I use an Early 2008 MacPro as my main computer btw and it does not, along with the two you mentioned, belong with the 2006 and 2007 as they have very little in common. Most of the posts in the MacPro sub forum relate to these 2008 to 2012 units anyway. So they seem to be just fine where they are.
 
This thread on OpenCore ...

... has had a few heated exchanges recently which I think is related to it being a sticky thread.

Basically, with it being a sticky thread, and considering the thread title, users have gravitated to it to ask questions on any OpenCore on MacPro issues.

The thread sets out one way of implementing OpenCore but of late, many of the queries have been related to an alternative method which has led to some angry/agressive responses from some of the thread regulars that have needed intervention by moderators.

A new thread covering other methods of implementing OpenCore was recently created in response to the angst but many users still gravitate to the old sticky thread to ask for support on alternative implementation options. This is understandable,especially for new users, as that is what they see upfront.

The alternative thread is this:

I think the position as a sticky thread is big part of the problem and the thread starter has stated that some OpenCore on MacPro queries should be avoided on the thread so as avoid irritating members that may interpret queries as a disregard for the material in the first post of that thread:

Bearing this in mind, I suggest the admin team consider one of the following options:
  1. Make the thread a normal thread. That is, "Unsticky" it
  2. Make the other thread a "Sticky" thread as well
I think Option 1 is better myself.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.