Hi all,
a friend of mine made me a proposal : an equal exchange of our macbook Pro.
Mine is a mid 2012 13'' i5 2.5 ghz with 8Gb of Ram, his is a late 2011 15'' hi res i7 2.2 ghz with 4 gb of Ram, and a 6750 with 512mb of video memory. He needs more portability, so the 15 has become a little too big and heavy to carry around all day.
I use my Macbook mainly with Photoshop, Lightroom, Pages, and obviously a ton of Safari and chrome tabs. I carry it around but not very much, sometimes i use it in clamshell mode and sometimes with dual monitor.
Do you think that the discrete graphic card really makes a difference? I am mainly satisfied with my macbook, only i suffer for the very low resolution that limits me for example when i write articles for my blog, because working with the browser near Pages is very uncomfortable. I would like to try the bigger screen and the power of quad core (even if sandy bridge) and the discrete graphic card, but is really more powerful?
sorry for my english ad thanks
a friend of mine made me a proposal : an equal exchange of our macbook Pro.
Mine is a mid 2012 13'' i5 2.5 ghz with 8Gb of Ram, his is a late 2011 15'' hi res i7 2.2 ghz with 4 gb of Ram, and a 6750 with 512mb of video memory. He needs more portability, so the 15 has become a little too big and heavy to carry around all day.
I use my Macbook mainly with Photoshop, Lightroom, Pages, and obviously a ton of Safari and chrome tabs. I carry it around but not very much, sometimes i use it in clamshell mode and sometimes with dual monitor.
Do you think that the discrete graphic card really makes a difference? I am mainly satisfied with my macbook, only i suffer for the very low resolution that limits me for example when i write articles for my blog, because working with the browser near Pages is very uncomfortable. I would like to try the bigger screen and the power of quad core (even if sandy bridge) and the discrete graphic card, but is really more powerful?
sorry for my english ad thanks