Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ignatius345

macrumors G3
Original poster
Aug 20, 2015
8,668
15,543
Why are signatures allowed to have political statments? IMO it's distracting and way off the normal scope of discussion in a computer tech focused forum. It just raises the temperature for no reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatTribble
One of the first things I did too ^. Used to be involved heavily in the old politics forum - wasn't worth it. Glad they have the option to turn that off now so those who wish to spend their time doing that can, and those of us who don't are happy too :D.

REALLY bugs me about Discord now ... forcing those user Title tags - people putting political messages in those with (as far as I know) - no way to turn it off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
Why are signatures allowed to have political statments?

this is why:
Political content is permitted in signatures as part of the balance between freedom to express opinions and maintaining order in the forums. Forum members have used signatures to list their Apple products, to be silly or serious, to promote causes (including the MacRumors Blood Drive), to personalize their online presence, but also to state political opinions. Normally this does not disrupt forum discussions, so it's an overall benefit to allow them. In extreme cases, the rules permit the moderators to change or remove a signature that is causing problems.

The Political News and PRSI forums are separate forums that members are free to visit or to ignore. In the same way, signatures are separate from posts and members are free to display or ignore them.

To suppress the display of signatures, go to your Preferences and uncheck "Show people's signatures with their messages."

Since signatures are not categorized, there isn't a way to suppress political signatures while allowing others, but of course you can ignore particular users to avoid seeing their signatures.
 
Oh well, I guess I'll have to change my avatar, which I was contemplating to do anyway, and compress some text - say "Das Kapital" - in its place. /jk

I'm glad the forum allows this flexibility for the members, thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Oh well, I guess I'll have to change my avatar, which I was contemplating to do anyway, and compress some text - say "Das Kapital" - in its place. /jk

I'm glad the forum allows this flexibility for the members, thanks!
Considering that Karl Marx was enlisted to do his work and funded by bankers based in London it is anybody's best guess what exactly "political statement" "Das Kapital" spreads.

The problem with the "statements" is that everybody have a different level of understanding and therefore "put it where everybody can see it and nobody will be able to see it" remains forever true.
 
It's not a new phenomenon that people only read titles/headlines, which can be misunderstood, twisted or even false.

I was, and am (as is my right as a Brit) very sarcastic at times. People love to say "“Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit! hahahahaha" not realising that their brains have run out of space half way through the quote 😁

"Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but the highest form of intelligence.” - Oscar Wilde
 
It's not a new phenomenon that people only read titles/headlines, which can be misunderstood, twisted or even false.

I was, and am (as is my right as a Brit) very sarcastic at times. People love to say "“Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit! hahahahaha" not realising that their brains have run out of space half way through the quote 😁

"Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but the highest form of intelligence.” - Oscar Wilde
I would say that sarcasm is just a "lightweight" example of a very serious point that there are first order consequence(what you can see on the surface) and second, third and so on order consequences where the real "game" is actually happening.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.