Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Sossity

macrumors 65816
Original poster
May 12, 2010
1,360
32
apologies if I have asked this already but I have found the portables are very convenient, I can just plug them in vs swapping out my bigger bare desktop sized drives in an enclosure.

in addtion to the convenice of the smaller size, my desktop space and drawer space is cramped, andthe smaller drives would be alot easier for me to manage.


I have alot of data on various hard drives, and would like quick easy acess to it all.

is there a big difference in reliability between the 2 types?

I am also looking for some reusable labels for my portables for easy id of whats on them, and a good usb hub to work on my classic mac pro mid 2010.

any suggestions welcome thanks
 
Last edited:
At one time 3.5" drives seemed to be more reliable than their 2.5" counterparts, however, I'm not so sure that's the case any longer. Besides, with SSDs taking over the industry I don't think it's something to worry about.
 
Don't trust a single hard drive for your valuable data, always backup.
 
Yes, if you have data that resides exclusively on an external drive (not on your internal drive), you need to keep that backed up to ANOTHER external drive.

One copy is NOT enough!

Having said that, I think 2.5" drives are as "sturdy" in day-to-day usage as are 3.5" drives, at least these days.
Also, with a 3.5" drive, you'll ALWAYS need an external power supply. Many 2.5" drives can run off "bus power" (either USB or firewire).
 
which type would better survive a power failure? my neighborhood has about 3-4 a year, late summer, and during windy storms.

I read that usb powered drives can get corrupted, but ones that have a power supply are less vunerable.

if I had my portables attached via a powered usb hub, would this help?
 
apologies if I have asked this already but I have found the portables are very convenient, I can just plug them in vs swapping out my bigger bare desktop sized drives in an enclosure.

in addtion to the convenice of the smaller size, my desktop space and drawer space is cramped, andthe smaller drives would be alot easier for me to manage.


I have alot of data on various hard drives, and would like quick easy acess to it all.

is there a big difference in reliability between the 2 types?

I am also looking for some reusable labels for my portables for easy id of whats on them, and a good usb hub to work on my classic mac pro mid 2010.

any suggestions welcome thanks

The only differences of any real significance (with regard to mechanical drives) are size and cost (3.5" drives are typically available in larger sizes, and a lower cost per GB than 2.5" drives).

If you haven't already, you might also want to consider using SSDs in external enclosures. They have very low power consumption / can be powered by USB alone, and are not only available in a 2.5" form factor, but also even smaller form factors such as mSATA as well.

SSDs are also more reliable than mechanical drives in terms of both raw endurance, as well as durability (e.g. it's all too easy to damage an external mechanical drive by bumping / dropping the drive while it's active, whereas SSDs have no moving parts, making them more tolerant to abuse).

Additionally, you have the obvious performance benefits of SSDs. An SSD in a SATA III enclosure with UASP support gets 400+ MBps read/write over USB 3.0 / 3.1, whereas a mechanical drive isn't going to provide more than 100 MBps read/write, regardless of interface (as the bottleneck is the drive itself).

While SSDs are still a bit more money than mechanical drives, they are now at a much more competitive / reasonable price point.

Anyway, here are a few examples:

Small mSATA enclosure + Samsung 850 EVO mSATA SSD:
-https://www.amazon.com/ORICO-Aluminum-Enclosure-ASM1153E-Controller/dp/B01BDKUCH6
-https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-850-EVO-Internal-MZ-M5E250BW/dp/B00TGIVTP2

You can get that mSATA Samsung 850 EVO in sizes from 120GB to 1TB, and stick it in an enclosure not that much larger than a thumb drive.

Or you can purchase any standard 2.5" SSD, and stick it in enclosures like these:

SATA III -> USB 3.0 (5 Gbps) with UASP
-https://www.amazon.com/StarTech-com-2-5in-External-SATA-Enclosure/dp/B00E1JAB3M

SATA III -> USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) with UASP
-https://www.amazon.com/StarTech-com-Gbps-Enclosure-SATA-Drives/dp/B00XLB0EOW

One option to protect against power failure is to go with an enterprise SSD like the Samsung SM863 / PM863. These SSDs have tantalum capacitors on them to protect against sudden loss of power (they hold enough charge to wrap up any current operations and power down safely). You can also simply purchase a UPS.
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
thanks for the info on ssd drives, yeah I would like to go to them, but they are still a bit too much for me right now, I need capacites of at least 2 tb for all my photos movies and data.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.