Your making me cry. :'( That machine is not old yet. My main X machine is a 9600.Originally posted by SilvorX
but theyre ollllllld...and most of them have os 8.5 or so on them...n the old beige keyboard/mouse....never thought osx was possible on one of those things...
i had those at school too....*shudders at the thought of macs before os x* what a nightmare they were...these were the days when i actually liked M$'s offering of an os better than apples...how quickly things changeOriginally posted by SilvorX
our school has bout 12 of those...theyre not that bad for speed, but theyre ollllllld...and most of them have os 8.5 or so on them...n the old beige keyboard/mouse....never thought osx was possible on one of those things....its emac-ish a teeny bit but the emac has alot better specs and the PowerMac had a 15" screen...
I shudder at the new world macs that dropped SCSI for IDE, 4 expansion bays for 2, 12 RAM slots for 3-4, 6 PCI for 3-4. Shows the the price vs expandability gap has widened significantly.Originally posted by BongHits
*shudders at the thought of macs before os x*
Originally posted by mc68k
I shudder at the new world macs that dropped SCSI for IDE, 4 expansion bays for 2, 12 RAM slots for 3-4, 6 PCI for 3-4. Shows the the price vs expandability gap has widened significantly.
IDE is a cheap technology. I was forced to SCSI because of constant IDE failures. IDE was put in out of cheapness, but your argument is still valid. quality vs quantityOriginally posted by Nipsy
What has me shuddering is the $1400 price tag attached to a 146GB SCSI Drive. That sort of kills the price expandability argument, as you could buy a TB of IDE for that.
I guess that would be Apple's fault. Offerings from other companies (Tyan for example) allow for 3x+ the RAM slots of current macs.Also, as the current chips can not address more than 2GB of RAM, what would the point of extra slots be?
Agreed. I guess most of the manufacturers that have six don't have 4 64-bit length slots.I could always use more PCI slots, however, 4PCI and one AGP is a pretty good compromise.
True. They were under diifferent ownership then. But at least then they came out with new solutions, not just overclocked machines with half assed DDR implemenation. Dual procerssors sound impressive, but the G4 is really getting long in the tooth. You can tell by the 7-pound heatsinks.I think alls well when you compare a $3200 1.25x2 with a $9200 Quadra 950...
Hmmm.. all the DT and MT on this page show socket-A. All G3 DT and MT excluding the iMac have had upgradable ZIF. Even the Yikes did, with the 7400 G4.Originally posted by big
ie...
the beige G3 did not have an upgradable zif (as claimed) until the B&W made the scene....
I shudder at the new world macs that dropped SCSI for IDE, 4 expansion bays for 2, 12 RAM slots for 3-4, 6 PCI for 3-4. Shows the the price vs expandability gap has widened significantly.
Originally posted by 3777
That is cool, looks like a collectors item to me...
Also, as the current chips can not address more than 2GB of RAM, what would the point of extra slots be?
The MPC7450 microprocessor contains separate memory management units for instructions and data, supporting 4 Petabytes (2 pow 52)* of virtual memory and up to 64 Gigabytes (2 pow 36)* of physical memory.
Originally posted by dukestreet
yes, and he's running OSX on it as well (from the screen)
But I'm thinking its a bit ugly, no?
D
Originally posted by 3777
It's no iMac G3 or eMac, but still kind of neat looking, and could be worth something someday