Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Faster speed with 3g using 2.0.1?

  • yes

    Votes: 23 51.1%
  • no

    Votes: 22 48.9%

  • Total voters
    45
I'm happy =)
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 85
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_0_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5B108 Safari/525.20)

405.9 Kbps with 3/5 bars.
 
I got 2.05Mbps near work/downtown on my way home in trafffic and 2.1 Mbps at home right now.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0001.PNG
    IMG_0001.PNG
    61.2 KB · Views: 72
  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    56.4 KB · Views: 75
3G 2.0.1 update speeds

I have noticed more bars in my house but at my job usually I got great 3G reception. Now not able to keep a 3G signal.
these were tested at my apt. in San Diego. I got a few "The test file size was too big we are running a bigger test for you." not sure what that meant.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0018.PNG
    IMG_0018.PNG
    64.7 KB · Views: 65
  • IMG_0016.PNG
    IMG_0016.PNG
    65.3 KB · Views: 73
  • IMG_0006.PNG
    IMG_0006.PNG
    63.9 KB · Views: 68
  • IMG_0007.PNG
    IMG_0007.PNG
    61.9 KB · Views: 78
  • IMG_0008.PNG
    IMG_0008.PNG
    61.1 KB · Views: 72
My Speeds have stayed just about the same, didn't notice a difference with 2.0.1 but the overall is much smoother. :)
 
Download test at testmyiphone.com with 3G (2 bars) got 0.68 Mbps (683Kbps / 83 kB/s). Seems pathetic compared to what most of you are getting. Browsing seems like dial-up or worse. I live in a suburb of DC.
 
In Durham UK here speeds of 1.68Mbps are fairly good for 3g as far as im concerned, its not always this fast of course and I could get much worse on 2.0.0 but also just as good depending where i am.

I think 2.0.1 is switching back to edge a little more where signal for 3g isnt so good, im fairly sure this is because when 3g is bad you get speeds similar or worse than edge and therefore might as well be on edge and save a bit of battery. Which would sort of fit as there are a few comments that 2.0.1 is better for battery life.

Speed on any of these networks is so variable though, signal is far more varied than a wired broadband or even wireless broadband, and we are sharing bandwidth with anyone else connected to the same cell towers so comparisons are often almost irrelevant. Even 2 phones next to each other and seemingly identical could be connecting to different towers and therefore getting different signals and speeds
 
Pretty good for me with 2.0.1



I have been getting speeds right around there all the time now after the update.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.