Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MICHAELSD

macrumors 603
Original poster
Jul 13, 2008
5,522
3,535
NJ
Yes, now the Apple Watch may require an iPhone to function but inevitably it will be a standalone product capable of utilizing a cellular connection after a few generations. In analyzing my iPhone usage out of the house, I have realized that the Apple Watch could replace all but situations that require typing on my iPhone. If I am hanging out somewhere, eating out, or at school I really do not need to carry a full phone. In fact, there are more situations where I could get by just fine with an Apple Watch that had cellular capabilities and native apps (which are coming later this year) than not. In place of my iPhone, I would more than likely carry around an iPad Air if I feel I will need more full-featured apps. Hell, I would be perfectly content with a 7" iPhone if I already had an Apple Watch.

What Apple Watch does now is limit you and make you even more tether to a phone. What it could do is let you focus more on the world around you rather than being stuck in the digital world of your phone, and that could be a major aspect of it going forward. The Apple Watch may very well bring us to a simpler time when people weren't tethered to their phone all-day and only use technology when out on a need-to basis.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.